Skip to main content
Tensor9 BYOC reference cost models for Amazon DynamoDB. Read/write mix, item size, consistency, index amplification and retained data determine the comparison. A database configuration price does not establish its supported point-operation throughput. Read how Tensor9 estimates service-adapter costs for billing scope, fixed versus variable charges, capacity qualification and a worked example. The comparisons below appear without calculator input.

DynamoDB → Azure Cosmos DB (provisioned)

Origin API: aws::1.0.0::dynamodb::control. Target backend: azure::1.0.0::cosmosdb::provisioned.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: eastus; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Writes and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → eastus, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Provisioned Cosmos DB bills reserved throughput in 100 RU/s blocks per hour, not consumed operations: planning-peak reads at 1 RU and writes at about 5.5 RU each are summed and rounded up to whole 100 RU/s blocks, with the documented 400 RU/s manual minimum (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/set-throughput). The blocks are a hard throughput limit, so they are planned at full utilization of the planning peak. Autoscale (USD 0.012 per 100 RU/s-hour, 100-1,000 RU/s entry) and the free tier (1,000 RU/s and 25 GB on one account) are not selected. Each additional region bills its own RU/s and storage.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Azure Retail Prices API: https://prices.azure.com/api/retail/prices
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-c920be7e617e9f0a40743bb26db180c9036769e6 / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-1. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Azure Retail Prices API.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: eastus; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Reads and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → eastus, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Provisioned Cosmos DB bills reserved throughput in 100 RU/s blocks per hour, not consumed operations: planning-peak reads at 1 RU and writes at about 5.5 RU each are summed and rounded up to whole 100 RU/s blocks, with the documented 400 RU/s manual minimum (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/set-throughput). The blocks are a hard throughput limit, so they are planned at full utilization of the planning peak. Autoscale (USD 0.012 per 100 RU/s-hour, 100-1,000 RU/s entry) and the free tier (1,000 RU/s and 25 GB on one account) are not selected. Each additional region bills its own RU/s and storage.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Azure Retail Prices API: https://prices.azure.com/api/retail/prices
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-c920be7e617e9f0a40743bb26db180c9036769e6 / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-2. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Azure Retail Prices API.

DynamoDB · Stored data

Estimated monthly service charges by Stored data. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: eastus; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Request meters remain at their independently authored defaults. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → eastus, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Provisioned Cosmos DB bills reserved throughput in 100 RU/s blocks per hour, not consumed operations: planning-peak reads at 1 RU and writes at about 5.5 RU each are summed and rounded up to whole 100 RU/s blocks, with the documented 400 RU/s manual minimum (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/set-throughput). The blocks are a hard throughput limit, so they are planned at full utilization of the planning peak. Autoscale (USD 0.012 per 100 RU/s-hour, 100-1,000 RU/s entry) and the free tier (1,000 RU/s and 25 GB on one account) are not selected. Each additional region bills its own RU/s and storage.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Azure Retail Prices API: https://prices.azure.com/api/retail/prices
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-c920be7e617e9f0a40743bb26db180c9036769e6 / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-3. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Azure Retail Prices API.

DynamoDB → Azure Cosmos DB (provisioned)

Origin API: aws::1.0.0::dynamodb::table. Target backend: azure::1.0.0::cosmosdb::provisioned.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: eastus; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Writes and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → eastus, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Provisioned Cosmos DB bills reserved throughput in 100 RU/s blocks per hour, not consumed operations: planning-peak reads at 1 RU and writes at about 5.5 RU each are summed and rounded up to whole 100 RU/s blocks, with the documented 400 RU/s manual minimum (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/set-throughput). The blocks are a hard throughput limit, so they are planned at full utilization of the planning peak. Autoscale (USD 0.012 per 100 RU/s-hour, 100-1,000 RU/s entry) and the free tier (1,000 RU/s and 25 GB on one account) are not selected. Each additional region bills its own RU/s and storage.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Azure Retail Prices API: https://prices.azure.com/api/retail/prices
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-fa502df1b7bcaf6b86688cf2258a7216e475f489 / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-1. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Azure Retail Prices API.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: eastus; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Reads and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → eastus, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Provisioned Cosmos DB bills reserved throughput in 100 RU/s blocks per hour, not consumed operations: planning-peak reads at 1 RU and writes at about 5.5 RU each are summed and rounded up to whole 100 RU/s blocks, with the documented 400 RU/s manual minimum (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/set-throughput). The blocks are a hard throughput limit, so they are planned at full utilization of the planning peak. Autoscale (USD 0.012 per 100 RU/s-hour, 100-1,000 RU/s entry) and the free tier (1,000 RU/s and 25 GB on one account) are not selected. Each additional region bills its own RU/s and storage.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Azure Retail Prices API: https://prices.azure.com/api/retail/prices
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-fa502df1b7bcaf6b86688cf2258a7216e475f489 / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-2. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Azure Retail Prices API.

DynamoDB · Stored data

Estimated monthly service charges by Stored data. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: eastus; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Request meters remain at their independently authored defaults. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → eastus, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Provisioned Cosmos DB bills reserved throughput in 100 RU/s blocks per hour, not consumed operations: planning-peak reads at 1 RU and writes at about 5.5 RU each are summed and rounded up to whole 100 RU/s blocks, with the documented 400 RU/s manual minimum (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/set-throughput). The blocks are a hard throughput limit, so they are planned at full utilization of the planning peak. Autoscale (USD 0.012 per 100 RU/s-hour, 100-1,000 RU/s entry) and the free tier (1,000 RU/s and 25 GB on one account) are not selected. Each additional region bills its own RU/s and storage.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Azure Retail Prices API: https://prices.azure.com/api/retail/prices
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-fa502df1b7bcaf6b86688cf2258a7216e475f489 / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-3. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Azure Retail Prices API.

DynamoDB → Azure Cosmos DB (serverless)

Origin API: aws::1.0.0::dynamodb::control. Target backend: azure::1.0.0::cosmosdb::serverless.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: eastus; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Writes and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → eastus, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Cosmos DB serverless bills consumed Request Units (USD 0.25 per million) and stored GB. Per-operation rates assume Microsoft’s published 1 KB costs: a point read is 1 RU and an unindexed insert about 5.5 RU (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/optimize-cost-reads-writes). Larger items, default indexing of every property, replaces (2x an insert) and strong or bounded-staleness reads (2x) cost more RU than these rates assume.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Azure Retail Prices API: https://prices.azure.com/api/retail/prices
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-193a4d8c9f7cdd8a1e2cad0fae8d95ed44aad86e / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-1. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Azure Retail Prices API.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: eastus; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Reads and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → eastus, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Cosmos DB serverless bills consumed Request Units (USD 0.25 per million) and stored GB. Per-operation rates assume Microsoft’s published 1 KB costs: a point read is 1 RU and an unindexed insert about 5.5 RU (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/optimize-cost-reads-writes). Larger items, default indexing of every property, replaces (2x an insert) and strong or bounded-staleness reads (2x) cost more RU than these rates assume.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Azure Retail Prices API: https://prices.azure.com/api/retail/prices
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-193a4d8c9f7cdd8a1e2cad0fae8d95ed44aad86e / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-2. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Azure Retail Prices API.

DynamoDB · Stored data

Estimated monthly service charges by Stored data. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: eastus; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Request meters remain at their independently authored defaults. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → eastus, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Cosmos DB serverless bills consumed Request Units (USD 0.25 per million) and stored GB. Per-operation rates assume Microsoft’s published 1 KB costs: a point read is 1 RU and an unindexed insert about 5.5 RU (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/optimize-cost-reads-writes). Larger items, default indexing of every property, replaces (2x an insert) and strong or bounded-staleness reads (2x) cost more RU than these rates assume.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Azure Retail Prices API: https://prices.azure.com/api/retail/prices
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-193a4d8c9f7cdd8a1e2cad0fae8d95ed44aad86e / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-3. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Azure Retail Prices API.

DynamoDB → Azure Cosmos DB (serverless)

Origin API: aws::1.0.0::dynamodb::table. Target backend: azure::1.0.0::cosmosdb::serverless.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: eastus; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Writes and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → eastus, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Cosmos DB serverless bills consumed Request Units (USD 0.25 per million) and stored GB. Per-operation rates assume Microsoft’s published 1 KB costs: a point read is 1 RU and an unindexed insert about 5.5 RU (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/optimize-cost-reads-writes). Larger items, default indexing of every property, replaces (2x an insert) and strong or bounded-staleness reads (2x) cost more RU than these rates assume.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Azure Retail Prices API: https://prices.azure.com/api/retail/prices
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-26501e747dcdbd0b7586f4ab58235e0ced69b13c / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-1. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Azure Retail Prices API.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: eastus; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Reads and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → eastus, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Cosmos DB serverless bills consumed Request Units (USD 0.25 per million) and stored GB. Per-operation rates assume Microsoft’s published 1 KB costs: a point read is 1 RU and an unindexed insert about 5.5 RU (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/optimize-cost-reads-writes). Larger items, default indexing of every property, replaces (2x an insert) and strong or bounded-staleness reads (2x) cost more RU than these rates assume.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Azure Retail Prices API: https://prices.azure.com/api/retail/prices
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-26501e747dcdbd0b7586f4ab58235e0ced69b13c / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-2. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Azure Retail Prices API.

DynamoDB · Stored data

Estimated monthly service charges by Stored data. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: eastus; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Request meters remain at their independently authored defaults. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → eastus, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Cosmos DB serverless bills consumed Request Units (USD 0.25 per million) and stored GB. Per-operation rates assume Microsoft’s published 1 KB costs: a point read is 1 RU and an unindexed insert about 5.5 RU (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/optimize-cost-reads-writes). Larger items, default indexing of every property, replaces (2x an insert) and strong or bounded-staleness reads (2x) cost more RU than these rates assume.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Azure Retail Prices API: https://prices.azure.com/api/retail/prices
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-26501e747dcdbd0b7586f4ab58235e0ced69b13c / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-3. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Azure Retail Prices API.

DynamoDB → Cloud Bigtable

Origin API: aws::1.0.0::dynamodb::control. Target backend: google::1.0.0::bigtable.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-central1; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Writes and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → us-central1, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Bigtable bills whole provisioned nodes per hour, not vCPU or RAM, plus SSD storage of the compressed physical data. Nodes are sized from planning-peak reads and writes against Google’s per-node SSD throughput, with a one-node minimum. A replicated instance bills every cluster’s nodes and its own copy of the data; this profile prices one cluster, so the standby selection does not add a cluster.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Bigtable pricing: https://cloud.google.com/bigtable/pricing
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-54c656ab4ad36cede3d0182c3bf9faef6669d51d / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-1. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Bigtable pricing.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-central1; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Reads and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → us-central1, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Bigtable bills whole provisioned nodes per hour, not vCPU or RAM, plus SSD storage of the compressed physical data. Nodes are sized from planning-peak reads and writes against Google’s per-node SSD throughput, with a one-node minimum. A replicated instance bills every cluster’s nodes and its own copy of the data; this profile prices one cluster, so the standby selection does not add a cluster.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Bigtable pricing: https://cloud.google.com/bigtable/pricing
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-54c656ab4ad36cede3d0182c3bf9faef6669d51d / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-2. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Bigtable pricing.

DynamoDB · Stored data

Estimated monthly service charges by Stored data. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-central1; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Request meters remain at their independently authored defaults. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → us-central1, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Bigtable bills whole provisioned nodes per hour, not vCPU or RAM, plus SSD storage of the compressed physical data. Nodes are sized from planning-peak reads and writes against Google’s per-node SSD throughput, with a one-node minimum. A replicated instance bills every cluster’s nodes and its own copy of the data; this profile prices one cluster, so the standby selection does not add a cluster.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Bigtable pricing: https://cloud.google.com/bigtable/pricing
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-54c656ab4ad36cede3d0182c3bf9faef6669d51d / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-3. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Bigtable pricing.

DynamoDB → Cloud Bigtable

Origin API: aws::1.0.0::dynamodb::table. Target backend: google::1.0.0::bigtable.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-central1; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Writes and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → us-central1, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Bigtable bills whole provisioned nodes per hour, not vCPU or RAM, plus SSD storage of the compressed physical data. Nodes are sized from planning-peak reads and writes against Google’s per-node SSD throughput, with a one-node minimum. A replicated instance bills every cluster’s nodes and its own copy of the data; this profile prices one cluster, so the standby selection does not add a cluster.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Bigtable pricing: https://cloud.google.com/bigtable/pricing
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-320830a9a89c06c228905dd61fe8054528d71731 / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-1. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Bigtable pricing.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-central1; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Reads and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → us-central1, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Bigtable bills whole provisioned nodes per hour, not vCPU or RAM, plus SSD storage of the compressed physical data. Nodes are sized from planning-peak reads and writes against Google’s per-node SSD throughput, with a one-node minimum. A replicated instance bills every cluster’s nodes and its own copy of the data; this profile prices one cluster, so the standby selection does not add a cluster.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Bigtable pricing: https://cloud.google.com/bigtable/pricing
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-320830a9a89c06c228905dd61fe8054528d71731 / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-2. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Bigtable pricing.

DynamoDB · Stored data

Estimated monthly service charges by Stored data. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-central1; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Request meters remain at their independently authored defaults. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → us-central1, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Bigtable bills whole provisioned nodes per hour, not vCPU or RAM, plus SSD storage of the compressed physical data. Nodes are sized from planning-peak reads and writes against Google’s per-node SSD throughput, with a one-node minimum. A replicated instance bills every cluster’s nodes and its own copy of the data; this profile prices one cluster, so the standby selection does not add a cluster.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Bigtable pricing: https://cloud.google.com/bigtable/pricing
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-320830a9a89c06c228905dd61fe8054528d71731 / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-3. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Bigtable pricing.

DynamoDB → Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL

Origin API: aws::1.0.0::dynamodb::table. Target backend: google::1.0.0::cloudsql::postgresql.

Monthly cost by DynamoDB point-read rate

Reference monthly service charges by Read operations/s. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-central1; currency: USD.
Monthly cost by DynamoDB point-read rate: monthly service charges by Read operations/s. Exact values are in the following table.Monthly cost by DynamoDB point-read rate: monthly service charges by Read operations/s. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Strong 1 KiB point reads and plain writes; one write per ten reads, no origin index amplification. 730 hours/month; retained source data stays at 100 GiB. Cloud SQL has 2 vCPU, 8 GiB memory and 200 GiB SSD. Twice source storage is an authored reserve, not a measured sizing rule; throughput remains unqualified.
  • Reference list rates as of 2026-10-18: us-east-1 → us-central1, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Cloud SQL configuration pricing only: throughput, peak load, latency and storage suitability are unqualified. No capacity benchmark is implied.
  • 730 running hours per modeled month. Dedicated database compute and disk cost money even with zero origin traffic.
  • Shared database allocation is a caller assumption. Do not sum a full database charge for every adapter sharing that database.
  • Origin workload is point GetItem and plain PutItem on Standard on-demand tables. Queries, transactions and Streams are not modeled.
  • Source usage is priced at reference rates; source lines are not actual invoice charges. Free or discounted usage still consumes target resources.
  • AWS DynamoDB Standard on-demand pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Cloud SQL Enterprise PostgreSQL pricing: https://cloud.google.com/sql/pricing/
Cost scope: Modeled monthly service usage and selected database allocation; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees only when explicitly supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Free allowances, negotiated discounts, credits, tax and one-time migration charges.
  • Charges not listed in the breakdown, including additional network transfer, backups and encryption/KMS.
  • Application compute changes, operational labor and portfolio-wide sharing or deduplication of infrastructure.
  • DynamoDB provisioned capacity, global replicas, transactions, queries/scans and Streams; unqualified database sizing.
Rate snapshot: 2026-10-18. Model: dynamodb-cloudsql / 2026-10-18.4. Curve: read-rate. Sources: AWS DynamoDB Standard on-demand pricing, Cloud SQL Enterprise PostgreSQL pricing.

Monthly cost by retained DynamoDB data

Reference monthly service charges by Retained source data. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-central1; currency: USD.
Monthly cost by retained DynamoDB data: monthly service charges by Retained source data. Exact values are in the following table.Monthly cost by retained DynamoDB data: monthly service charges by Retained source data. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Source traffic stays at 100 million strong 1 KiB read units and 10 million plain write units/month, with no origin index amplification. Cloud SQL uses 2 vCPU and 8 GiB memory; SSD provision is twice source GiB, rounded up to whole GiB with a 10 GiB minimum. This reserve is an authored assumption, not a measured expansion factor or capacity qualification.
  • Reference list rates as of 2026-10-18: us-east-1 → us-central1, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Cloud SQL configuration pricing only: throughput, peak load, latency and storage suitability are unqualified. No capacity benchmark is implied.
  • 730 running hours per modeled month. Dedicated database compute and disk cost money even with zero origin traffic.
  • Shared database allocation is a caller assumption. Do not sum a full database charge for every adapter sharing that database.
  • Origin workload is point GetItem and plain PutItem on Standard on-demand tables. Queries, transactions and Streams are not modeled.
  • Source usage is priced at reference rates; source lines are not actual invoice charges. Free or discounted usage still consumes target resources.
  • AWS DynamoDB Standard on-demand pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Cloud SQL Enterprise PostgreSQL pricing: https://cloud.google.com/sql/pricing/
Cost scope: Modeled monthly service usage and selected database allocation; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees only when explicitly supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Free allowances, negotiated discounts, credits, tax and one-time migration charges.
  • Charges not listed in the breakdown, including additional network transfer, backups and encryption/KMS.
  • Application compute changes, operational labor and portfolio-wide sharing or deduplication of infrastructure.
  • DynamoDB provisioned capacity, global replicas, transactions, queries/scans and Streams; unqualified database sizing.
Rate snapshot: 2026-10-18. Model: dynamodb-cloudsql / 2026-10-18.4. Curve: retained-data. Sources: AWS DynamoDB Standard on-demand pricing, Cloud SQL Enterprise PostgreSQL pricing.

DynamoDB → Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL

Origin API: aws::1.0.0::dynamodb::control. Target backend: google::1.0.0::cloudsql::postgresql.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-central1; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. Lines connect evaluated samples; intermediate capacity and prices are not inferred. Unpriced means no target quote or cost difference is available within the sizing policy. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. The sizing policy grows compute with translated work and peak headroom, memory with compute and working set, and disk with resident working state and reserve. Monthly usage is distinct from resident data; each workload’s assumptions define the translation. HA changes pricing, not this policy’s throughput estimate. Unpriced workloads exceed the policy’s configuration range; no silent vertical cap or automatic sharding is assumed.
  • Row-store throughput (capacityOpsPerVcpuSecond, default 1500) is measured-by-tensor9 as a lower bound: the DynamoDB adapter on Cloud SQL db-custom-2-7680 (2 vCPU, PostgreSQL 16, us-west1) served 2,974 ops/s of YCSB-A at 16 threads without recorded saturation (src/main/kotlin/t9/prime/equiv/generated/eval/CloudsqlPostgresqlYcsbAT16GoYcsbV1_0_0.kt). Published CPU-bound pgbench reaches 3,101 read-write transactions and 20,289 point reads per vCPU-second (AWS z1d.2xlarge, PostgreSQL 14.5), so actual capacity is likely higher. Reads and writes share one coefficient: at the same adapter version, read-only YCSB-C was not faster than 50%-update YCSB-A.
  • Log-broker throughput (capacityStreamMiBPerVcpuSecond 20 at 0.5 utilization, 4 GiB RAM per vCPU) is provider-documented by Google Managed Service for Apache Kafka sizing (https://docs.cloud.google.com/managed-service-for-apache-kafka/docs/plan-cluster-size): write-equivalent bytes are replicated writes plus a quarter of reads. Producer batches below 10 KB lower per-CPU throughput; that penalty is not modeled.
  • Disk utilization 0.8 is provider-documented headroom below Cloud SQL automatic storage increase, which triggers near 91-95% full (https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/instance-settings). The 20 GiB reserve exceeds PostgreSQL’s 1 GB default max_wal_size; the remainder of that reserve is unmeasured.
  • CPU tiers, 4 GiB per vCPU, at most 6.5 GiB per vCPU, 96 vCPU and 65,536 GiB disk follow Cloud SQL Enterprise custom machine limits (provider-documented, same page); 624 GiB is 96 × 6.5. Targets billed per node, unit or throughput unit are sized by their backend instead.
  • No public evidence: peak/mean work (2) and the RAM working-set fraction (0.1). Proposed measurements: the p99 one-minute rate over the monthly mean from customer CloudWatch metrics; the buffer hit ratio while stepping RAM under a fixed YCSB-B load.
  • Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
  • The operations/vCPU coefficient supplies the compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
  • Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.
Curve assumptions
  • Writes and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → us-central1, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Cloud SQL Enterprise edition (PostgreSQL) publishes separate vCPU, memory and SSD prices for zonal instances; a high-availability (regional) instance bills exactly twice each, which the standby copy reproduces. Enterprise Plus, committed-use discounts, backups (USD 0.08 per GiB-month) and idle IPv4 addresses (0.01 per hour) are not selected.
  • Row-store throughput (capacityOpsPerVcpuSecond, default 1500) is measured-by-tensor9 as a lower bound: the DynamoDB adapter on Cloud SQL db-custom-2-7680 (2 vCPU, PostgreSQL 16, us-west1) served 2,974 ops/s of YCSB-A at 16 threads without recorded saturation (src/main/kotlin/t9/prime/equiv/generated/eval/CloudsqlPostgresqlYcsbAT16GoYcsbV1_0_0.kt). Published CPU-bound pgbench reaches 3,101 read-write transactions and 20,289 point reads per vCPU-second (AWS z1d.2xlarge, PostgreSQL 14.5), so actual capacity is likely higher. Reads and writes share one coefficient: at the same adapter version, read-only YCSB-C was not faster than 50%-update YCSB-A.
  • Log-broker throughput (capacityStreamMiBPerVcpuSecond 20 at 0.5 utilization, 4 GiB RAM per vCPU) is provider-documented by Google Managed Service for Apache Kafka sizing (https://docs.cloud.google.com/managed-service-for-apache-kafka/docs/plan-cluster-size): write-equivalent bytes are replicated writes plus a quarter of reads. Producer batches below 10 KB lower per-CPU throughput; that penalty is not modeled.
  • Disk utilization 0.8 is provider-documented headroom below Cloud SQL automatic storage increase, which triggers near 91-95% full (https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/instance-settings). The 20 GiB reserve exceeds PostgreSQL’s 1 GB default max_wal_size; the remainder of that reserve is unmeasured.
  • CPU tiers, 4 GiB per vCPU, at most 6.5 GiB per vCPU, 96 vCPU and 65,536 GiB disk follow Cloud SQL Enterprise custom machine limits (provider-documented, same page); 624 GiB is 96 × 6.5. Targets billed per node, unit or throughput unit are sized by their backend instead.
  • No public evidence: peak/mean work (2) and the RAM working-set fraction (0.1). Proposed measurements: the p99 one-minute rate over the monthly mean from customer CloudWatch metrics; the buffer hit ratio while stepping RAM under a fixed YCSB-B load.
  • Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
  • The operations/vCPU coefficient supplies the compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
  • Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Cloud SQL pricing: https://cloud.google.com/sql/pricing
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-f1008577e0cf5d5cb82de2bf437390d5c3a08962 / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-1. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Cloud SQL pricing.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-central1; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. Lines connect evaluated samples; intermediate capacity and prices are not inferred. Unpriced means no target quote or cost difference is available within the sizing policy. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. The sizing policy grows compute with translated work and peak headroom, memory with compute and working set, and disk with resident working state and reserve. Monthly usage is distinct from resident data; each workload’s assumptions define the translation. HA changes pricing, not this policy’s throughput estimate. Unpriced workloads exceed the policy’s configuration range; no silent vertical cap or automatic sharding is assumed.
  • Row-store throughput (capacityOpsPerVcpuSecond, default 1500) is measured-by-tensor9 as a lower bound: the DynamoDB adapter on Cloud SQL db-custom-2-7680 (2 vCPU, PostgreSQL 16, us-west1) served 2,974 ops/s of YCSB-A at 16 threads without recorded saturation (src/main/kotlin/t9/prime/equiv/generated/eval/CloudsqlPostgresqlYcsbAT16GoYcsbV1_0_0.kt). Published CPU-bound pgbench reaches 3,101 read-write transactions and 20,289 point reads per vCPU-second (AWS z1d.2xlarge, PostgreSQL 14.5), so actual capacity is likely higher. Reads and writes share one coefficient: at the same adapter version, read-only YCSB-C was not faster than 50%-update YCSB-A.
  • Log-broker throughput (capacityStreamMiBPerVcpuSecond 20 at 0.5 utilization, 4 GiB RAM per vCPU) is provider-documented by Google Managed Service for Apache Kafka sizing (https://docs.cloud.google.com/managed-service-for-apache-kafka/docs/plan-cluster-size): write-equivalent bytes are replicated writes plus a quarter of reads. Producer batches below 10 KB lower per-CPU throughput; that penalty is not modeled.
  • Disk utilization 0.8 is provider-documented headroom below Cloud SQL automatic storage increase, which triggers near 91-95% full (https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/instance-settings). The 20 GiB reserve exceeds PostgreSQL’s 1 GB default max_wal_size; the remainder of that reserve is unmeasured.
  • CPU tiers, 4 GiB per vCPU, at most 6.5 GiB per vCPU, 96 vCPU and 65,536 GiB disk follow Cloud SQL Enterprise custom machine limits (provider-documented, same page); 624 GiB is 96 × 6.5. Targets billed per node, unit or throughput unit are sized by their backend instead.
  • No public evidence: peak/mean work (2) and the RAM working-set fraction (0.1). Proposed measurements: the p99 one-minute rate over the monthly mean from customer CloudWatch metrics; the buffer hit ratio while stepping RAM under a fixed YCSB-B load.
  • Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
  • The operations/vCPU coefficient supplies the compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
  • Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.
Curve assumptions
  • Reads and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → us-central1, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Cloud SQL Enterprise edition (PostgreSQL) publishes separate vCPU, memory and SSD prices for zonal instances; a high-availability (regional) instance bills exactly twice each, which the standby copy reproduces. Enterprise Plus, committed-use discounts, backups (USD 0.08 per GiB-month) and idle IPv4 addresses (0.01 per hour) are not selected.
  • Row-store throughput (capacityOpsPerVcpuSecond, default 1500) is measured-by-tensor9 as a lower bound: the DynamoDB adapter on Cloud SQL db-custom-2-7680 (2 vCPU, PostgreSQL 16, us-west1) served 2,974 ops/s of YCSB-A at 16 threads without recorded saturation (src/main/kotlin/t9/prime/equiv/generated/eval/CloudsqlPostgresqlYcsbAT16GoYcsbV1_0_0.kt). Published CPU-bound pgbench reaches 3,101 read-write transactions and 20,289 point reads per vCPU-second (AWS z1d.2xlarge, PostgreSQL 14.5), so actual capacity is likely higher. Reads and writes share one coefficient: at the same adapter version, read-only YCSB-C was not faster than 50%-update YCSB-A.
  • Log-broker throughput (capacityStreamMiBPerVcpuSecond 20 at 0.5 utilization, 4 GiB RAM per vCPU) is provider-documented by Google Managed Service for Apache Kafka sizing (https://docs.cloud.google.com/managed-service-for-apache-kafka/docs/plan-cluster-size): write-equivalent bytes are replicated writes plus a quarter of reads. Producer batches below 10 KB lower per-CPU throughput; that penalty is not modeled.
  • Disk utilization 0.8 is provider-documented headroom below Cloud SQL automatic storage increase, which triggers near 91-95% full (https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/instance-settings). The 20 GiB reserve exceeds PostgreSQL’s 1 GB default max_wal_size; the remainder of that reserve is unmeasured.
  • CPU tiers, 4 GiB per vCPU, at most 6.5 GiB per vCPU, 96 vCPU and 65,536 GiB disk follow Cloud SQL Enterprise custom machine limits (provider-documented, same page); 624 GiB is 96 × 6.5. Targets billed per node, unit or throughput unit are sized by their backend instead.
  • No public evidence: peak/mean work (2) and the RAM working-set fraction (0.1). Proposed measurements: the p99 one-minute rate over the monthly mean from customer CloudWatch metrics; the buffer hit ratio while stepping RAM under a fixed YCSB-B load.
  • Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
  • The operations/vCPU coefficient supplies the compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
  • Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Cloud SQL pricing: https://cloud.google.com/sql/pricing
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-f1008577e0cf5d5cb82de2bf437390d5c3a08962 / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-2. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Cloud SQL pricing.

DynamoDB · Stored data

Estimated monthly service charges by Stored data. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-central1; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. Lines connect evaluated samples; intermediate capacity and prices are not inferred. Unpriced means no target quote or cost difference is available within the sizing policy. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. The sizing policy grows compute with translated work and peak headroom, memory with compute and working set, and disk with resident working state and reserve. Monthly usage is distinct from resident data; each workload’s assumptions define the translation. HA changes pricing, not this policy’s throughput estimate. Unpriced workloads exceed the policy’s configuration range; no silent vertical cap or automatic sharding is assumed.
  • Row-store throughput (capacityOpsPerVcpuSecond, default 1500) is measured-by-tensor9 as a lower bound: the DynamoDB adapter on Cloud SQL db-custom-2-7680 (2 vCPU, PostgreSQL 16, us-west1) served 2,974 ops/s of YCSB-A at 16 threads without recorded saturation (src/main/kotlin/t9/prime/equiv/generated/eval/CloudsqlPostgresqlYcsbAT16GoYcsbV1_0_0.kt). Published CPU-bound pgbench reaches 3,101 read-write transactions and 20,289 point reads per vCPU-second (AWS z1d.2xlarge, PostgreSQL 14.5), so actual capacity is likely higher. Reads and writes share one coefficient: at the same adapter version, read-only YCSB-C was not faster than 50%-update YCSB-A.
  • Log-broker throughput (capacityStreamMiBPerVcpuSecond 20 at 0.5 utilization, 4 GiB RAM per vCPU) is provider-documented by Google Managed Service for Apache Kafka sizing (https://docs.cloud.google.com/managed-service-for-apache-kafka/docs/plan-cluster-size): write-equivalent bytes are replicated writes plus a quarter of reads. Producer batches below 10 KB lower per-CPU throughput; that penalty is not modeled.
  • Disk utilization 0.8 is provider-documented headroom below Cloud SQL automatic storage increase, which triggers near 91-95% full (https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/instance-settings). The 20 GiB reserve exceeds PostgreSQL’s 1 GB default max_wal_size; the remainder of that reserve is unmeasured.
  • CPU tiers, 4 GiB per vCPU, at most 6.5 GiB per vCPU, 96 vCPU and 65,536 GiB disk follow Cloud SQL Enterprise custom machine limits (provider-documented, same page); 624 GiB is 96 × 6.5. Targets billed per node, unit or throughput unit are sized by their backend instead.
  • No public evidence: peak/mean work (2) and the RAM working-set fraction (0.1). Proposed measurements: the p99 one-minute rate over the monthly mean from customer CloudWatch metrics; the buffer hit ratio while stepping RAM under a fixed YCSB-B load.
  • Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
  • The operations/vCPU coefficient supplies the compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
  • Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.
Curve assumptions
  • Request meters remain at their independently authored defaults. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → us-central1, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Cloud SQL Enterprise edition (PostgreSQL) publishes separate vCPU, memory and SSD prices for zonal instances; a high-availability (regional) instance bills exactly twice each, which the standby copy reproduces. Enterprise Plus, committed-use discounts, backups (USD 0.08 per GiB-month) and idle IPv4 addresses (0.01 per hour) are not selected.
  • Row-store throughput (capacityOpsPerVcpuSecond, default 1500) is measured-by-tensor9 as a lower bound: the DynamoDB adapter on Cloud SQL db-custom-2-7680 (2 vCPU, PostgreSQL 16, us-west1) served 2,974 ops/s of YCSB-A at 16 threads without recorded saturation (src/main/kotlin/t9/prime/equiv/generated/eval/CloudsqlPostgresqlYcsbAT16GoYcsbV1_0_0.kt). Published CPU-bound pgbench reaches 3,101 read-write transactions and 20,289 point reads per vCPU-second (AWS z1d.2xlarge, PostgreSQL 14.5), so actual capacity is likely higher. Reads and writes share one coefficient: at the same adapter version, read-only YCSB-C was not faster than 50%-update YCSB-A.
  • Log-broker throughput (capacityStreamMiBPerVcpuSecond 20 at 0.5 utilization, 4 GiB RAM per vCPU) is provider-documented by Google Managed Service for Apache Kafka sizing (https://docs.cloud.google.com/managed-service-for-apache-kafka/docs/plan-cluster-size): write-equivalent bytes are replicated writes plus a quarter of reads. Producer batches below 10 KB lower per-CPU throughput; that penalty is not modeled.
  • Disk utilization 0.8 is provider-documented headroom below Cloud SQL automatic storage increase, which triggers near 91-95% full (https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/instance-settings). The 20 GiB reserve exceeds PostgreSQL’s 1 GB default max_wal_size; the remainder of that reserve is unmeasured.
  • CPU tiers, 4 GiB per vCPU, at most 6.5 GiB per vCPU, 96 vCPU and 65,536 GiB disk follow Cloud SQL Enterprise custom machine limits (provider-documented, same page); 624 GiB is 96 × 6.5. Targets billed per node, unit or throughput unit are sized by their backend instead.
  • No public evidence: peak/mean work (2) and the RAM working-set fraction (0.1). Proposed measurements: the p99 one-minute rate over the monthly mean from customer CloudWatch metrics; the buffer hit ratio while stepping RAM under a fixed YCSB-B load.
  • Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
  • The operations/vCPU coefficient supplies the compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
  • Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Cloud SQL pricing: https://cloud.google.com/sql/pricing
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-f1008577e0cf5d5cb82de2bf437390d5c3a08962 / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-3. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Cloud SQL pricing.

DynamoDB → Cloud Spanner

Origin API: aws::1.0.0::dynamodb::control. Target backend: google::1.0.0::spanner.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-central1; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Writes and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → us-central1, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Spanner bills compute capacity in processing units (100 PU minimum and steps, 1,000 PU per node) whose price includes the three replicas of a regional configuration, plus SSD storage including all replicas. Capacity is sized from planning-peak reads and writes against Google’s per-node throughput; replication is built in, so the standby selection adds no copy. Enterprise (USD 1.23) and Enterprise Plus (1.71 per node-hour) editions, dual- and multi-region configurations and per-node storage limits are not selected.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Spanner pricing: https://cloud.google.com/spanner/pricing
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-1f7602bf670b04f3676190fd832f3a586a145caa / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-1. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Spanner pricing.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-central1; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Reads and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → us-central1, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Spanner bills compute capacity in processing units (100 PU minimum and steps, 1,000 PU per node) whose price includes the three replicas of a regional configuration, plus SSD storage including all replicas. Capacity is sized from planning-peak reads and writes against Google’s per-node throughput; replication is built in, so the standby selection adds no copy. Enterprise (USD 1.23) and Enterprise Plus (1.71 per node-hour) editions, dual- and multi-region configurations and per-node storage limits are not selected.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Spanner pricing: https://cloud.google.com/spanner/pricing
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-1f7602bf670b04f3676190fd832f3a586a145caa / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-2. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Spanner pricing.

DynamoDB · Stored data

Estimated monthly service charges by Stored data. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-central1; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Request meters remain at their independently authored defaults. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → us-central1, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Spanner bills compute capacity in processing units (100 PU minimum and steps, 1,000 PU per node) whose price includes the three replicas of a regional configuration, plus SSD storage including all replicas. Capacity is sized from planning-peak reads and writes against Google’s per-node throughput; replication is built in, so the standby selection adds no copy. Enterprise (USD 1.23) and Enterprise Plus (1.71 per node-hour) editions, dual- and multi-region configurations and per-node storage limits are not selected.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Spanner pricing: https://cloud.google.com/spanner/pricing
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-1f7602bf670b04f3676190fd832f3a586a145caa / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-3. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Spanner pricing.

DynamoDB → Cloud Spanner

Origin API: aws::1.0.0::dynamodb::table. Target backend: google::1.0.0::spanner.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-central1; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Writes and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → us-central1, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Spanner bills compute capacity in processing units (100 PU minimum and steps, 1,000 PU per node) whose price includes the three replicas of a regional configuration, plus SSD storage including all replicas. Capacity is sized from planning-peak reads and writes against Google’s per-node throughput; replication is built in, so the standby selection adds no copy. Enterprise (USD 1.23) and Enterprise Plus (1.71 per node-hour) editions, dual- and multi-region configurations and per-node storage limits are not selected.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Spanner pricing: https://cloud.google.com/spanner/pricing
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-610b516e23e900c58eeb455757b30a011c363c10 / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-1. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Spanner pricing.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-central1; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Reads and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → us-central1, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Spanner bills compute capacity in processing units (100 PU minimum and steps, 1,000 PU per node) whose price includes the three replicas of a regional configuration, plus SSD storage including all replicas. Capacity is sized from planning-peak reads and writes against Google’s per-node throughput; replication is built in, so the standby selection adds no copy. Enterprise (USD 1.23) and Enterprise Plus (1.71 per node-hour) editions, dual- and multi-region configurations and per-node storage limits are not selected.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Spanner pricing: https://cloud.google.com/spanner/pricing
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-610b516e23e900c58eeb455757b30a011c363c10 / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-2. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Spanner pricing.

DynamoDB · Stored data

Estimated monthly service charges by Stored data. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-central1; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Request meters remain at their independently authored defaults. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → us-central1, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Spanner bills compute capacity in processing units (100 PU minimum and steps, 1,000 PU per node) whose price includes the three replicas of a regional configuration, plus SSD storage including all replicas. Capacity is sized from planning-peak reads and writes against Google’s per-node throughput; replication is built in, so the standby selection adds no copy. Enterprise (USD 1.23) and Enterprise Plus (1.71 per node-hour) editions, dual- and multi-region configurations and per-node storage limits are not selected.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Spanner pricing: https://cloud.google.com/spanner/pricing
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-610b516e23e900c58eeb455757b30a011c363c10 / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-3. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Spanner pricing.

DynamoDB → Firestore

Origin API: aws::1.0.0::dynamodb::table. Target backend: google::1.0.0::firestore.

Monthly cost by DynamoDB point-read rate

Reference monthly service charges by Read operations/s. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-central1; currency: USD.
Monthly cost by DynamoDB point-read rate: monthly service charges by Read operations/s. Exact values are in the following table.Monthly cost by DynamoDB point-read rate: monthly service charges by Read operations/s. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Strong 1 KiB point reads and plain writes; one write per ten reads, no origin index amplification. 730 hours/month; retained source data stays at 100 GiB. Firestore uses one document per item, blind writes, no extra reads and equal billed storage; this is an illustrative storage assumption.
  • Reference list rates as of 2026-10-18: us-east-1 → us-central1, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Firestore Standard edition, regional us-central1. One document read per origin point read; explicit reads/writes per write.
  • Plain unconditioned PutItem can use the blind write path; read-modify-write, conditions and retries increase document reads.
  • Equal physical storage is an illustrative assumption; tagged item envelopes, metadata and indexes can change billed bytes.
  • Source usage is priced at reference rates; source lines are not actual invoice charges. Free or discounted usage still consumes target resources.
  • AWS DynamoDB Standard on-demand pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Firestore Standard regional pricing: https://cloud.google.com/firestore/pricing/
Cost scope: Modeled monthly service usage and selected database allocation; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees only when explicitly supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Free allowances, negotiated discounts, credits, tax and one-time migration charges.
  • Charges not listed in the breakdown, including additional network transfer, backups and encryption/KMS.
  • Application compute changes, operational labor and portfolio-wide sharing or deduplication of infrastructure.
  • Queries, scans and index-entry reads, transactions, Streams, document deletes/TTL and unsupported item domains.
Rate snapshot: 2026-10-18. Model: dynamodb-firestore / 2026-10-18.4. Curve: read-rate. Sources: AWS DynamoDB Standard on-demand pricing, Firestore Standard regional pricing.

Monthly cost by retained DynamoDB data

Reference monthly service charges by Retained source data. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-central1; currency: USD.
Monthly cost by retained DynamoDB data: monthly service charges by Retained source data. Exact values are in the following table.Monthly cost by retained DynamoDB data: monthly service charges by Retained source data. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Source traffic stays at 100 million strong 1 KiB read units and 10 million plain write units/month, with no origin index amplification. Firestore assumes equal billed storage, one document per item and blind writes; physical expansion and indexing require separate qualification.
  • Reference list rates as of 2026-10-18: us-east-1 → us-central1, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Firestore Standard edition, regional us-central1. One document read per origin point read; explicit reads/writes per write.
  • Plain unconditioned PutItem can use the blind write path; read-modify-write, conditions and retries increase document reads.
  • Equal physical storage is an illustrative assumption; tagged item envelopes, metadata and indexes can change billed bytes.
  • Source usage is priced at reference rates; source lines are not actual invoice charges. Free or discounted usage still consumes target resources.
  • AWS DynamoDB Standard on-demand pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Firestore Standard regional pricing: https://cloud.google.com/firestore/pricing/
Cost scope: Modeled monthly service usage and selected database allocation; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees only when explicitly supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Free allowances, negotiated discounts, credits, tax and one-time migration charges.
  • Charges not listed in the breakdown, including additional network transfer, backups and encryption/KMS.
  • Application compute changes, operational labor and portfolio-wide sharing or deduplication of infrastructure.
  • Queries, scans and index-entry reads, transactions, Streams, document deletes/TTL and unsupported item domains.
Rate snapshot: 2026-10-18. Model: dynamodb-firestore / 2026-10-18.4. Curve: retained-data. Sources: AWS DynamoDB Standard on-demand pricing, Firestore Standard regional pricing.

DynamoDB → Firestore

Origin API: aws::1.0.0::dynamodb::control. Target backend: google::1.0.0::firestore.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-central1; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Writes and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → us-central1, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Firestore Standard edition in us-central1 bills document reads, writes and deletes per operation and stored GiB-months. Index-entry reads (one read per batch of up to 1,000 entries) and query fan-out belong in workload translation. Deletes bill USD 0.01 per 100,000 (one ninth of a write), but this profile has no delete rate, so deletes the workload translates as writes are overstated. The daily free quota (50,000 reads, 20,000 writes, 20,000 deletes, 1 GiB) applies only to a project’s default database and is not applied; the first 10 GiB/month of internet egress are free and are not applied.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Firestore pricing: https://cloud.google.com/firestore/pricing
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-4ac0e0ca0267692d3ee4ec3549bf7a6dc8998ba8 / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-1. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Firestore pricing.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-central1; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Reads and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → us-central1, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Firestore Standard edition in us-central1 bills document reads, writes and deletes per operation and stored GiB-months. Index-entry reads (one read per batch of up to 1,000 entries) and query fan-out belong in workload translation. Deletes bill USD 0.01 per 100,000 (one ninth of a write), but this profile has no delete rate, so deletes the workload translates as writes are overstated. The daily free quota (50,000 reads, 20,000 writes, 20,000 deletes, 1 GiB) applies only to a project’s default database and is not applied; the first 10 GiB/month of internet egress are free and are not applied.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Firestore pricing: https://cloud.google.com/firestore/pricing
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-4ac0e0ca0267692d3ee4ec3549bf7a6dc8998ba8 / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-2. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Firestore pricing.

DynamoDB · Stored data

Estimated monthly service charges by Stored data. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-central1; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Request meters remain at their independently authored defaults. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → us-central1, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Firestore Standard edition in us-central1 bills document reads, writes and deletes per operation and stored GiB-months. Index-entry reads (one read per batch of up to 1,000 entries) and query fan-out belong in workload translation. Deletes bill USD 0.01 per 100,000 (one ninth of a write), but this profile has no delete rate, so deletes the workload translates as writes are overstated. The daily free quota (50,000 reads, 20,000 writes, 20,000 deletes, 1 GiB) applies only to a project’s default database and is not applied; the first 10 GiB/month of internet egress are free and are not applied.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Firestore pricing: https://cloud.google.com/firestore/pricing
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-4ac0e0ca0267692d3ee4ec3549bf7a6dc8998ba8 / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-3. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Firestore pricing.

DynamoDB → OCI NoSQL Database

Origin API: aws::1.0.0::dynamodb::control. Target backend: oci::1.0.0::nosql. Native or deployment mapping. The mapping provisions OCI NoSQL tables without exposing a DynamoDB management endpoint. There is no DynamoDB request-serving fabric on this path. Cost estimates describe the selected service resources; operation coverage remains separate.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-ashburn-1 (global list); currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Writes and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → us-ashburn-1 (global list), USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Native/deployment comparison scope: The mapping provisions OCI NoSQL tables without exposing a DynamoDB management endpoint. There is no DynamoDB request-serving fabric on this path.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Oracle NoSQL Database Cloud on-demand capacity bills consumed 1 KB read and write units and stored GB. Absolute-consistency reads cost two read units; larger records cost one unit per KB. Provisioned capacity (USD 0.0064 per read unit-month and 0.1254 per write unit-month, parts B89738 and B89737) and the Always Free tables are not selected.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • OCI price list API: https://apexapps.oracle.com/pls/apex/cetools/api/v1/products/
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-a45d0e6d8b183b039aefa956c723cea5c9269d3d / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-1. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, OCI price list API.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-ashburn-1 (global list); currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Reads and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → us-ashburn-1 (global list), USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Native/deployment comparison scope: The mapping provisions OCI NoSQL tables without exposing a DynamoDB management endpoint. There is no DynamoDB request-serving fabric on this path.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Oracle NoSQL Database Cloud on-demand capacity bills consumed 1 KB read and write units and stored GB. Absolute-consistency reads cost two read units; larger records cost one unit per KB. Provisioned capacity (USD 0.0064 per read unit-month and 0.1254 per write unit-month, parts B89738 and B89737) and the Always Free tables are not selected.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • OCI price list API: https://apexapps.oracle.com/pls/apex/cetools/api/v1/products/
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-a45d0e6d8b183b039aefa956c723cea5c9269d3d / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-2. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, OCI price list API.

DynamoDB · Stored data

Estimated monthly service charges by Stored data. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-ashburn-1 (global list); currency: USD.
DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Request meters remain at their independently authored defaults. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → us-ashburn-1 (global list), USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Native/deployment comparison scope: The mapping provisions OCI NoSQL tables without exposing a DynamoDB management endpoint. There is no DynamoDB request-serving fabric on this path.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Oracle NoSQL Database Cloud on-demand capacity bills consumed 1 KB read and write units and stored GB. Absolute-consistency reads cost two read units; larger records cost one unit per KB. Provisioned capacity (USD 0.0064 per read unit-month and 0.1254 per write unit-month, parts B89738 and B89737) and the Always Free tables are not selected.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • OCI price list API: https://apexapps.oracle.com/pls/apex/cetools/api/v1/products/
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-a45d0e6d8b183b039aefa956c723cea5c9269d3d / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-3. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, OCI price list API.

DynamoDB → OCI NoSQL Database

Origin API: aws::1.0.0::dynamodb::table. Target backend: oci::1.0.0::nosql. Native or deployment mapping. The application uses the OCI NoSQL API on this mapping. It does not provide a DynamoDB request translator, so DynamoDB fabric latency does not apply. Cost estimates describe the selected service resources; operation coverage remains separate.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-ashburn-1 (global list); currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Writes and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → us-ashburn-1 (global list), USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Native/deployment comparison scope: The application uses the OCI NoSQL API on this mapping. It does not provide a DynamoDB request translator, so DynamoDB fabric latency does not apply.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Oracle NoSQL Database Cloud on-demand capacity bills consumed 1 KB read and write units and stored GB. Absolute-consistency reads cost two read units; larger records cost one unit per KB. Provisioned capacity (USD 0.0064 per read unit-month and 0.1254 per write unit-month, parts B89738 and B89737) and the Always Free tables are not selected.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • OCI price list API: https://apexapps.oracle.com/pls/apex/cetools/api/v1/products/
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-d4b2a3538a1c61e563246f36c48dc1568328d822 / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-1. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, OCI price list API.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-ashburn-1 (global list); currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Reads and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → us-ashburn-1 (global list), USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Native/deployment comparison scope: The application uses the OCI NoSQL API on this mapping. It does not provide a DynamoDB request translator, so DynamoDB fabric latency does not apply.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Oracle NoSQL Database Cloud on-demand capacity bills consumed 1 KB read and write units and stored GB. Absolute-consistency reads cost two read units; larger records cost one unit per KB. Provisioned capacity (USD 0.0064 per read unit-month and 0.1254 per write unit-month, parts B89738 and B89737) and the Always Free tables are not selected.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • OCI price list API: https://apexapps.oracle.com/pls/apex/cetools/api/v1/products/
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-d4b2a3538a1c61e563246f36c48dc1568328d822 / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-2. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, OCI price list API.

DynamoDB · Stored data

Estimated monthly service charges by Stored data. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-ashburn-1 (global list); currency: USD.
DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Curve assumptions
  • Request meters remain at their independently authored defaults. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → us-ashburn-1 (global list), USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Native/deployment comparison scope: The application uses the OCI NoSQL API on this mapping. It does not provide a DynamoDB request translator, so DynamoDB fabric latency does not apply.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Oracle NoSQL Database Cloud on-demand capacity bills consumed 1 KB read and write units and stored GB. Absolute-consistency reads cost two read units; larger records cost one unit per KB. Provisioned capacity (USD 0.0064 per read unit-month and 0.1254 per write unit-month, parts B89738 and B89737) and the Always Free tables are not selected.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • OCI price list API: https://apexapps.oracle.com/pls/apex/cetools/api/v1/products/
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-d4b2a3538a1c61e563246f36c48dc1568328d822 / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-3. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, OCI price list API.

DynamoDB → PostgreSQL

Origin API: aws::1.0.0::dynamodb::control. Target backend: postgres::1.0.0::database.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-central1; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. Lines connect evaluated samples; intermediate capacity and prices are not inferred. Unpriced means no target quote or cost difference is available within the sizing policy. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. The sizing policy grows compute with translated work and peak headroom, memory with compute and working set, and disk with resident working state and reserve. Monthly usage is distinct from resident data; each workload’s assumptions define the translation. HA changes pricing, not this policy’s throughput estimate. Unpriced workloads exceed the policy’s configuration range; no silent vertical cap or automatic sharding is assumed.
  • Row-store throughput (capacityOpsPerVcpuSecond, default 1500) is measured-by-tensor9 as a lower bound: the DynamoDB adapter on Cloud SQL db-custom-2-7680 (2 vCPU, PostgreSQL 16, us-west1) served 2,974 ops/s of YCSB-A at 16 threads without recorded saturation (src/main/kotlin/t9/prime/equiv/generated/eval/CloudsqlPostgresqlYcsbAT16GoYcsbV1_0_0.kt). Published CPU-bound pgbench reaches 3,101 read-write transactions and 20,289 point reads per vCPU-second (AWS z1d.2xlarge, PostgreSQL 14.5), so actual capacity is likely higher. Reads and writes share one coefficient: at the same adapter version, read-only YCSB-C was not faster than 50%-update YCSB-A.
  • Log-broker throughput (capacityStreamMiBPerVcpuSecond 20 at 0.5 utilization, 4 GiB RAM per vCPU) is provider-documented by Google Managed Service for Apache Kafka sizing (https://docs.cloud.google.com/managed-service-for-apache-kafka/docs/plan-cluster-size): write-equivalent bytes are replicated writes plus a quarter of reads. Producer batches below 10 KB lower per-CPU throughput; that penalty is not modeled.
  • Disk utilization 0.8 is provider-documented headroom below Cloud SQL automatic storage increase, which triggers near 91-95% full (https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/instance-settings). The 20 GiB reserve exceeds PostgreSQL’s 1 GB default max_wal_size; the remainder of that reserve is unmeasured.
  • CPU tiers, 4 GiB per vCPU, at most 6.5 GiB per vCPU, 96 vCPU and 65,536 GiB disk follow Cloud SQL Enterprise custom machine limits (provider-documented, same page); 624 GiB is 96 × 6.5. Targets billed per node, unit or throughput unit are sized by their backend instead.
  • No public evidence: peak/mean work (2) and the RAM working-set fraction (0.1). Proposed measurements: the p99 one-minute rate over the monthly mean from customer CloudWatch metrics; the buffer hit ratio while stepping RAM under a fixed YCSB-B load.
  • Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
  • The operations/vCPU coefficient supplies the compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
  • Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.
Curve assumptions
  • Writes and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → us-central1, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Self-hosted target: PostgreSQL (PostgreSQL License, https://www.postgresql.org/about/licence/). Selected CPU, RAM and physical disk allocation grow with workload; no per-operation price is assumed. No vendor tariff: the target runs on the customer’s Kubernetes nodes, so CPU, RAM and disk bill at the Kubernetes node reference rates, Compute Engine N2 in us-central1 (USD 0.031611/vCPU-hour, 0.004237/GiB-hour) with pd-balanced disk (0.10/GiB-month) and Premium Tier egress. The cost-optimized E2 series lists 0.02181159/vCPU-hour and 0.00292353/GiB-hour; AWS m6i/r6i and Azure D2s v5/E2s v5 both decompose to 0.033/vCPU-hour and 0.00375/GiB-hour. Requested CPU and RAM are billed; node bin-packing waste, system reservations and the cluster control-plane fee are not.
  • Row-store throughput (capacityOpsPerVcpuSecond, default 1500) is measured-by-tensor9 as a lower bound: the DynamoDB adapter on Cloud SQL db-custom-2-7680 (2 vCPU, PostgreSQL 16, us-west1) served 2,974 ops/s of YCSB-A at 16 threads without recorded saturation (src/main/kotlin/t9/prime/equiv/generated/eval/CloudsqlPostgresqlYcsbAT16GoYcsbV1_0_0.kt). Published CPU-bound pgbench reaches 3,101 read-write transactions and 20,289 point reads per vCPU-second (AWS z1d.2xlarge, PostgreSQL 14.5), so actual capacity is likely higher. Reads and writes share one coefficient: at the same adapter version, read-only YCSB-C was not faster than 50%-update YCSB-A.
  • Log-broker throughput (capacityStreamMiBPerVcpuSecond 20 at 0.5 utilization, 4 GiB RAM per vCPU) is provider-documented by Google Managed Service for Apache Kafka sizing (https://docs.cloud.google.com/managed-service-for-apache-kafka/docs/plan-cluster-size): write-equivalent bytes are replicated writes plus a quarter of reads. Producer batches below 10 KB lower per-CPU throughput; that penalty is not modeled.
  • Disk utilization 0.8 is provider-documented headroom below Cloud SQL automatic storage increase, which triggers near 91-95% full (https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/instance-settings). The 20 GiB reserve exceeds PostgreSQL’s 1 GB default max_wal_size; the remainder of that reserve is unmeasured.
  • CPU tiers, 4 GiB per vCPU, at most 6.5 GiB per vCPU, 96 vCPU and 65,536 GiB disk follow Cloud SQL Enterprise custom machine limits (provider-documented, same page); 624 GiB is 96 × 6.5. Targets billed per node, unit or throughput unit are sized by their backend instead.
  • No public evidence: peak/mean work (2) and the RAM working-set fraction (0.1). Proposed measurements: the p99 one-minute rate over the monthly mean from customer CloudWatch metrics; the buffer hit ratio while stepping RAM under a fixed YCSB-B load.
  • Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
  • The operations/vCPU coefficient supplies the compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
  • Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Compute Engine general-purpose machine pricing: https://cloud.google.com/products/compute/pricing/general-purpose
  • Disk and image pricing: https://cloud.google.com/compute/disks-image-pricing
  • Network pricing: https://cloud.google.com/vpc/network-pricing
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-67ab648398db063f54620ef99fe9513d4263793e / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-1. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Compute Engine general-purpose machine pricing, Disk and image pricing, Network pricing.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-central1; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. Lines connect evaluated samples; intermediate capacity and prices are not inferred. Unpriced means no target quote or cost difference is available within the sizing policy. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. The sizing policy grows compute with translated work and peak headroom, memory with compute and working set, and disk with resident working state and reserve. Monthly usage is distinct from resident data; each workload’s assumptions define the translation. HA changes pricing, not this policy’s throughput estimate. Unpriced workloads exceed the policy’s configuration range; no silent vertical cap or automatic sharding is assumed.
  • Row-store throughput (capacityOpsPerVcpuSecond, default 1500) is measured-by-tensor9 as a lower bound: the DynamoDB adapter on Cloud SQL db-custom-2-7680 (2 vCPU, PostgreSQL 16, us-west1) served 2,974 ops/s of YCSB-A at 16 threads without recorded saturation (src/main/kotlin/t9/prime/equiv/generated/eval/CloudsqlPostgresqlYcsbAT16GoYcsbV1_0_0.kt). Published CPU-bound pgbench reaches 3,101 read-write transactions and 20,289 point reads per vCPU-second (AWS z1d.2xlarge, PostgreSQL 14.5), so actual capacity is likely higher. Reads and writes share one coefficient: at the same adapter version, read-only YCSB-C was not faster than 50%-update YCSB-A.
  • Log-broker throughput (capacityStreamMiBPerVcpuSecond 20 at 0.5 utilization, 4 GiB RAM per vCPU) is provider-documented by Google Managed Service for Apache Kafka sizing (https://docs.cloud.google.com/managed-service-for-apache-kafka/docs/plan-cluster-size): write-equivalent bytes are replicated writes plus a quarter of reads. Producer batches below 10 KB lower per-CPU throughput; that penalty is not modeled.
  • Disk utilization 0.8 is provider-documented headroom below Cloud SQL automatic storage increase, which triggers near 91-95% full (https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/instance-settings). The 20 GiB reserve exceeds PostgreSQL’s 1 GB default max_wal_size; the remainder of that reserve is unmeasured.
  • CPU tiers, 4 GiB per vCPU, at most 6.5 GiB per vCPU, 96 vCPU and 65,536 GiB disk follow Cloud SQL Enterprise custom machine limits (provider-documented, same page); 624 GiB is 96 × 6.5. Targets billed per node, unit or throughput unit are sized by their backend instead.
  • No public evidence: peak/mean work (2) and the RAM working-set fraction (0.1). Proposed measurements: the p99 one-minute rate over the monthly mean from customer CloudWatch metrics; the buffer hit ratio while stepping RAM under a fixed YCSB-B load.
  • Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
  • The operations/vCPU coefficient supplies the compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
  • Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.
Curve assumptions
  • Reads and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → us-central1, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Self-hosted target: PostgreSQL (PostgreSQL License, https://www.postgresql.org/about/licence/). Selected CPU, RAM and physical disk allocation grow with workload; no per-operation price is assumed. No vendor tariff: the target runs on the customer’s Kubernetes nodes, so CPU, RAM and disk bill at the Kubernetes node reference rates, Compute Engine N2 in us-central1 (USD 0.031611/vCPU-hour, 0.004237/GiB-hour) with pd-balanced disk (0.10/GiB-month) and Premium Tier egress. The cost-optimized E2 series lists 0.02181159/vCPU-hour and 0.00292353/GiB-hour; AWS m6i/r6i and Azure D2s v5/E2s v5 both decompose to 0.033/vCPU-hour and 0.00375/GiB-hour. Requested CPU and RAM are billed; node bin-packing waste, system reservations and the cluster control-plane fee are not.
  • Row-store throughput (capacityOpsPerVcpuSecond, default 1500) is measured-by-tensor9 as a lower bound: the DynamoDB adapter on Cloud SQL db-custom-2-7680 (2 vCPU, PostgreSQL 16, us-west1) served 2,974 ops/s of YCSB-A at 16 threads without recorded saturation (src/main/kotlin/t9/prime/equiv/generated/eval/CloudsqlPostgresqlYcsbAT16GoYcsbV1_0_0.kt). Published CPU-bound pgbench reaches 3,101 read-write transactions and 20,289 point reads per vCPU-second (AWS z1d.2xlarge, PostgreSQL 14.5), so actual capacity is likely higher. Reads and writes share one coefficient: at the same adapter version, read-only YCSB-C was not faster than 50%-update YCSB-A.
  • Log-broker throughput (capacityStreamMiBPerVcpuSecond 20 at 0.5 utilization, 4 GiB RAM per vCPU) is provider-documented by Google Managed Service for Apache Kafka sizing (https://docs.cloud.google.com/managed-service-for-apache-kafka/docs/plan-cluster-size): write-equivalent bytes are replicated writes plus a quarter of reads. Producer batches below 10 KB lower per-CPU throughput; that penalty is not modeled.
  • Disk utilization 0.8 is provider-documented headroom below Cloud SQL automatic storage increase, which triggers near 91-95% full (https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/instance-settings). The 20 GiB reserve exceeds PostgreSQL’s 1 GB default max_wal_size; the remainder of that reserve is unmeasured.
  • CPU tiers, 4 GiB per vCPU, at most 6.5 GiB per vCPU, 96 vCPU and 65,536 GiB disk follow Cloud SQL Enterprise custom machine limits (provider-documented, same page); 624 GiB is 96 × 6.5. Targets billed per node, unit or throughput unit are sized by their backend instead.
  • No public evidence: peak/mean work (2) and the RAM working-set fraction (0.1). Proposed measurements: the p99 one-minute rate over the monthly mean from customer CloudWatch metrics; the buffer hit ratio while stepping RAM under a fixed YCSB-B load.
  • Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
  • The operations/vCPU coefficient supplies the compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
  • Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Compute Engine general-purpose machine pricing: https://cloud.google.com/products/compute/pricing/general-purpose
  • Disk and image pricing: https://cloud.google.com/compute/disks-image-pricing
  • Network pricing: https://cloud.google.com/vpc/network-pricing
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-67ab648398db063f54620ef99fe9513d4263793e / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-2. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Compute Engine general-purpose machine pricing, Disk and image pricing, Network pricing.

DynamoDB · Stored data

Estimated monthly service charges by Stored data. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-central1; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. Lines connect evaluated samples; intermediate capacity and prices are not inferred. Unpriced means no target quote or cost difference is available within the sizing policy. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. The sizing policy grows compute with translated work and peak headroom, memory with compute and working set, and disk with resident working state and reserve. Monthly usage is distinct from resident data; each workload’s assumptions define the translation. HA changes pricing, not this policy’s throughput estimate. Unpriced workloads exceed the policy’s configuration range; no silent vertical cap or automatic sharding is assumed.
  • Row-store throughput (capacityOpsPerVcpuSecond, default 1500) is measured-by-tensor9 as a lower bound: the DynamoDB adapter on Cloud SQL db-custom-2-7680 (2 vCPU, PostgreSQL 16, us-west1) served 2,974 ops/s of YCSB-A at 16 threads without recorded saturation (src/main/kotlin/t9/prime/equiv/generated/eval/CloudsqlPostgresqlYcsbAT16GoYcsbV1_0_0.kt). Published CPU-bound pgbench reaches 3,101 read-write transactions and 20,289 point reads per vCPU-second (AWS z1d.2xlarge, PostgreSQL 14.5), so actual capacity is likely higher. Reads and writes share one coefficient: at the same adapter version, read-only YCSB-C was not faster than 50%-update YCSB-A.
  • Log-broker throughput (capacityStreamMiBPerVcpuSecond 20 at 0.5 utilization, 4 GiB RAM per vCPU) is provider-documented by Google Managed Service for Apache Kafka sizing (https://docs.cloud.google.com/managed-service-for-apache-kafka/docs/plan-cluster-size): write-equivalent bytes are replicated writes plus a quarter of reads. Producer batches below 10 KB lower per-CPU throughput; that penalty is not modeled.
  • Disk utilization 0.8 is provider-documented headroom below Cloud SQL automatic storage increase, which triggers near 91-95% full (https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/instance-settings). The 20 GiB reserve exceeds PostgreSQL’s 1 GB default max_wal_size; the remainder of that reserve is unmeasured.
  • CPU tiers, 4 GiB per vCPU, at most 6.5 GiB per vCPU, 96 vCPU and 65,536 GiB disk follow Cloud SQL Enterprise custom machine limits (provider-documented, same page); 624 GiB is 96 × 6.5. Targets billed per node, unit or throughput unit are sized by their backend instead.
  • No public evidence: peak/mean work (2) and the RAM working-set fraction (0.1). Proposed measurements: the p99 one-minute rate over the monthly mean from customer CloudWatch metrics; the buffer hit ratio while stepping RAM under a fixed YCSB-B load.
  • Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
  • The operations/vCPU coefficient supplies the compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
  • Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.
Curve assumptions
  • Request meters remain at their independently authored defaults. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → us-central1, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Self-hosted target: PostgreSQL (PostgreSQL License, https://www.postgresql.org/about/licence/). Selected CPU, RAM and physical disk allocation grow with workload; no per-operation price is assumed. No vendor tariff: the target runs on the customer’s Kubernetes nodes, so CPU, RAM and disk bill at the Kubernetes node reference rates, Compute Engine N2 in us-central1 (USD 0.031611/vCPU-hour, 0.004237/GiB-hour) with pd-balanced disk (0.10/GiB-month) and Premium Tier egress. The cost-optimized E2 series lists 0.02181159/vCPU-hour and 0.00292353/GiB-hour; AWS m6i/r6i and Azure D2s v5/E2s v5 both decompose to 0.033/vCPU-hour and 0.00375/GiB-hour. Requested CPU and RAM are billed; node bin-packing waste, system reservations and the cluster control-plane fee are not.
  • Row-store throughput (capacityOpsPerVcpuSecond, default 1500) is measured-by-tensor9 as a lower bound: the DynamoDB adapter on Cloud SQL db-custom-2-7680 (2 vCPU, PostgreSQL 16, us-west1) served 2,974 ops/s of YCSB-A at 16 threads without recorded saturation (src/main/kotlin/t9/prime/equiv/generated/eval/CloudsqlPostgresqlYcsbAT16GoYcsbV1_0_0.kt). Published CPU-bound pgbench reaches 3,101 read-write transactions and 20,289 point reads per vCPU-second (AWS z1d.2xlarge, PostgreSQL 14.5), so actual capacity is likely higher. Reads and writes share one coefficient: at the same adapter version, read-only YCSB-C was not faster than 50%-update YCSB-A.
  • Log-broker throughput (capacityStreamMiBPerVcpuSecond 20 at 0.5 utilization, 4 GiB RAM per vCPU) is provider-documented by Google Managed Service for Apache Kafka sizing (https://docs.cloud.google.com/managed-service-for-apache-kafka/docs/plan-cluster-size): write-equivalent bytes are replicated writes plus a quarter of reads. Producer batches below 10 KB lower per-CPU throughput; that penalty is not modeled.
  • Disk utilization 0.8 is provider-documented headroom below Cloud SQL automatic storage increase, which triggers near 91-95% full (https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/instance-settings). The 20 GiB reserve exceeds PostgreSQL’s 1 GB default max_wal_size; the remainder of that reserve is unmeasured.
  • CPU tiers, 4 GiB per vCPU, at most 6.5 GiB per vCPU, 96 vCPU and 65,536 GiB disk follow Cloud SQL Enterprise custom machine limits (provider-documented, same page); 624 GiB is 96 × 6.5. Targets billed per node, unit or throughput unit are sized by their backend instead.
  • No public evidence: peak/mean work (2) and the RAM working-set fraction (0.1). Proposed measurements: the p99 one-minute rate over the monthly mean from customer CloudWatch metrics; the buffer hit ratio while stepping RAM under a fixed YCSB-B load.
  • Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
  • The operations/vCPU coefficient supplies the compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
  • Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Compute Engine general-purpose machine pricing: https://cloud.google.com/products/compute/pricing/general-purpose
  • Disk and image pricing: https://cloud.google.com/compute/disks-image-pricing
  • Network pricing: https://cloud.google.com/vpc/network-pricing
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-67ab648398db063f54620ef99fe9513d4263793e / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-3. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Compute Engine general-purpose machine pricing, Disk and image pricing, Network pricing.

DynamoDB → PostgreSQL

Origin API: aws::1.0.0::dynamodb::table. Target backend: postgres::1.0.0::database.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-central1; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. Lines connect evaluated samples; intermediate capacity and prices are not inferred. Unpriced means no target quote or cost difference is available within the sizing policy. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. The sizing policy grows compute with translated work and peak headroom, memory with compute and working set, and disk with resident working state and reserve. Monthly usage is distinct from resident data; each workload’s assumptions define the translation. HA changes pricing, not this policy’s throughput estimate. Unpriced workloads exceed the policy’s configuration range; no silent vertical cap or automatic sharding is assumed.
  • Row-store throughput (capacityOpsPerVcpuSecond, default 1500) is measured-by-tensor9 as a lower bound: the DynamoDB adapter on Cloud SQL db-custom-2-7680 (2 vCPU, PostgreSQL 16, us-west1) served 2,974 ops/s of YCSB-A at 16 threads without recorded saturation (src/main/kotlin/t9/prime/equiv/generated/eval/CloudsqlPostgresqlYcsbAT16GoYcsbV1_0_0.kt). Published CPU-bound pgbench reaches 3,101 read-write transactions and 20,289 point reads per vCPU-second (AWS z1d.2xlarge, PostgreSQL 14.5), so actual capacity is likely higher. Reads and writes share one coefficient: at the same adapter version, read-only YCSB-C was not faster than 50%-update YCSB-A.
  • Log-broker throughput (capacityStreamMiBPerVcpuSecond 20 at 0.5 utilization, 4 GiB RAM per vCPU) is provider-documented by Google Managed Service for Apache Kafka sizing (https://docs.cloud.google.com/managed-service-for-apache-kafka/docs/plan-cluster-size): write-equivalent bytes are replicated writes plus a quarter of reads. Producer batches below 10 KB lower per-CPU throughput; that penalty is not modeled.
  • Disk utilization 0.8 is provider-documented headroom below Cloud SQL automatic storage increase, which triggers near 91-95% full (https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/instance-settings). The 20 GiB reserve exceeds PostgreSQL’s 1 GB default max_wal_size; the remainder of that reserve is unmeasured.
  • CPU tiers, 4 GiB per vCPU, at most 6.5 GiB per vCPU, 96 vCPU and 65,536 GiB disk follow Cloud SQL Enterprise custom machine limits (provider-documented, same page); 624 GiB is 96 × 6.5. Targets billed per node, unit or throughput unit are sized by their backend instead.
  • No public evidence: peak/mean work (2) and the RAM working-set fraction (0.1). Proposed measurements: the p99 one-minute rate over the monthly mean from customer CloudWatch metrics; the buffer hit ratio while stepping RAM under a fixed YCSB-B load.
  • Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
  • The operations/vCPU coefficient supplies the compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
  • Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.
Curve assumptions
  • Writes and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → us-central1, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Self-hosted target: PostgreSQL (PostgreSQL License, https://www.postgresql.org/about/licence/). Selected CPU, RAM and physical disk allocation grow with workload; no per-operation price is assumed. No vendor tariff: the target runs on the customer’s Kubernetes nodes, so CPU, RAM and disk bill at the Kubernetes node reference rates, Compute Engine N2 in us-central1 (USD 0.031611/vCPU-hour, 0.004237/GiB-hour) with pd-balanced disk (0.10/GiB-month) and Premium Tier egress. The cost-optimized E2 series lists 0.02181159/vCPU-hour and 0.00292353/GiB-hour; AWS m6i/r6i and Azure D2s v5/E2s v5 both decompose to 0.033/vCPU-hour and 0.00375/GiB-hour. Requested CPU and RAM are billed; node bin-packing waste, system reservations and the cluster control-plane fee are not.
  • Row-store throughput (capacityOpsPerVcpuSecond, default 1500) is measured-by-tensor9 as a lower bound: the DynamoDB adapter on Cloud SQL db-custom-2-7680 (2 vCPU, PostgreSQL 16, us-west1) served 2,974 ops/s of YCSB-A at 16 threads without recorded saturation (src/main/kotlin/t9/prime/equiv/generated/eval/CloudsqlPostgresqlYcsbAT16GoYcsbV1_0_0.kt). Published CPU-bound pgbench reaches 3,101 read-write transactions and 20,289 point reads per vCPU-second (AWS z1d.2xlarge, PostgreSQL 14.5), so actual capacity is likely higher. Reads and writes share one coefficient: at the same adapter version, read-only YCSB-C was not faster than 50%-update YCSB-A.
  • Log-broker throughput (capacityStreamMiBPerVcpuSecond 20 at 0.5 utilization, 4 GiB RAM per vCPU) is provider-documented by Google Managed Service for Apache Kafka sizing (https://docs.cloud.google.com/managed-service-for-apache-kafka/docs/plan-cluster-size): write-equivalent bytes are replicated writes plus a quarter of reads. Producer batches below 10 KB lower per-CPU throughput; that penalty is not modeled.
  • Disk utilization 0.8 is provider-documented headroom below Cloud SQL automatic storage increase, which triggers near 91-95% full (https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/instance-settings). The 20 GiB reserve exceeds PostgreSQL’s 1 GB default max_wal_size; the remainder of that reserve is unmeasured.
  • CPU tiers, 4 GiB per vCPU, at most 6.5 GiB per vCPU, 96 vCPU and 65,536 GiB disk follow Cloud SQL Enterprise custom machine limits (provider-documented, same page); 624 GiB is 96 × 6.5. Targets billed per node, unit or throughput unit are sized by their backend instead.
  • No public evidence: peak/mean work (2) and the RAM working-set fraction (0.1). Proposed measurements: the p99 one-minute rate over the monthly mean from customer CloudWatch metrics; the buffer hit ratio while stepping RAM under a fixed YCSB-B load.
  • Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
  • The operations/vCPU coefficient supplies the compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
  • Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Compute Engine general-purpose machine pricing: https://cloud.google.com/products/compute/pricing/general-purpose
  • Disk and image pricing: https://cloud.google.com/compute/disks-image-pricing
  • Network pricing: https://cloud.google.com/vpc/network-pricing
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-271febef7b5ad970d96d5373c36c91bf2d6b17bb / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-1. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Compute Engine general-purpose machine pricing, Disk and image pricing, Network pricing.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-central1; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. Lines connect evaluated samples; intermediate capacity and prices are not inferred. Unpriced means no target quote or cost difference is available within the sizing policy. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. The sizing policy grows compute with translated work and peak headroom, memory with compute and working set, and disk with resident working state and reserve. Monthly usage is distinct from resident data; each workload’s assumptions define the translation. HA changes pricing, not this policy’s throughput estimate. Unpriced workloads exceed the policy’s configuration range; no silent vertical cap or automatic sharding is assumed.
  • Row-store throughput (capacityOpsPerVcpuSecond, default 1500) is measured-by-tensor9 as a lower bound: the DynamoDB adapter on Cloud SQL db-custom-2-7680 (2 vCPU, PostgreSQL 16, us-west1) served 2,974 ops/s of YCSB-A at 16 threads without recorded saturation (src/main/kotlin/t9/prime/equiv/generated/eval/CloudsqlPostgresqlYcsbAT16GoYcsbV1_0_0.kt). Published CPU-bound pgbench reaches 3,101 read-write transactions and 20,289 point reads per vCPU-second (AWS z1d.2xlarge, PostgreSQL 14.5), so actual capacity is likely higher. Reads and writes share one coefficient: at the same adapter version, read-only YCSB-C was not faster than 50%-update YCSB-A.
  • Log-broker throughput (capacityStreamMiBPerVcpuSecond 20 at 0.5 utilization, 4 GiB RAM per vCPU) is provider-documented by Google Managed Service for Apache Kafka sizing (https://docs.cloud.google.com/managed-service-for-apache-kafka/docs/plan-cluster-size): write-equivalent bytes are replicated writes plus a quarter of reads. Producer batches below 10 KB lower per-CPU throughput; that penalty is not modeled.
  • Disk utilization 0.8 is provider-documented headroom below Cloud SQL automatic storage increase, which triggers near 91-95% full (https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/instance-settings). The 20 GiB reserve exceeds PostgreSQL’s 1 GB default max_wal_size; the remainder of that reserve is unmeasured.
  • CPU tiers, 4 GiB per vCPU, at most 6.5 GiB per vCPU, 96 vCPU and 65,536 GiB disk follow Cloud SQL Enterprise custom machine limits (provider-documented, same page); 624 GiB is 96 × 6.5. Targets billed per node, unit or throughput unit are sized by their backend instead.
  • No public evidence: peak/mean work (2) and the RAM working-set fraction (0.1). Proposed measurements: the p99 one-minute rate over the monthly mean from customer CloudWatch metrics; the buffer hit ratio while stepping RAM under a fixed YCSB-B load.
  • Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
  • The operations/vCPU coefficient supplies the compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
  • Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.
Curve assumptions
  • Reads and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → us-central1, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Self-hosted target: PostgreSQL (PostgreSQL License, https://www.postgresql.org/about/licence/). Selected CPU, RAM and physical disk allocation grow with workload; no per-operation price is assumed. No vendor tariff: the target runs on the customer’s Kubernetes nodes, so CPU, RAM and disk bill at the Kubernetes node reference rates, Compute Engine N2 in us-central1 (USD 0.031611/vCPU-hour, 0.004237/GiB-hour) with pd-balanced disk (0.10/GiB-month) and Premium Tier egress. The cost-optimized E2 series lists 0.02181159/vCPU-hour and 0.00292353/GiB-hour; AWS m6i/r6i and Azure D2s v5/E2s v5 both decompose to 0.033/vCPU-hour and 0.00375/GiB-hour. Requested CPU and RAM are billed; node bin-packing waste, system reservations and the cluster control-plane fee are not.
  • Row-store throughput (capacityOpsPerVcpuSecond, default 1500) is measured-by-tensor9 as a lower bound: the DynamoDB adapter on Cloud SQL db-custom-2-7680 (2 vCPU, PostgreSQL 16, us-west1) served 2,974 ops/s of YCSB-A at 16 threads without recorded saturation (src/main/kotlin/t9/prime/equiv/generated/eval/CloudsqlPostgresqlYcsbAT16GoYcsbV1_0_0.kt). Published CPU-bound pgbench reaches 3,101 read-write transactions and 20,289 point reads per vCPU-second (AWS z1d.2xlarge, PostgreSQL 14.5), so actual capacity is likely higher. Reads and writes share one coefficient: at the same adapter version, read-only YCSB-C was not faster than 50%-update YCSB-A.
  • Log-broker throughput (capacityStreamMiBPerVcpuSecond 20 at 0.5 utilization, 4 GiB RAM per vCPU) is provider-documented by Google Managed Service for Apache Kafka sizing (https://docs.cloud.google.com/managed-service-for-apache-kafka/docs/plan-cluster-size): write-equivalent bytes are replicated writes plus a quarter of reads. Producer batches below 10 KB lower per-CPU throughput; that penalty is not modeled.
  • Disk utilization 0.8 is provider-documented headroom below Cloud SQL automatic storage increase, which triggers near 91-95% full (https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/instance-settings). The 20 GiB reserve exceeds PostgreSQL’s 1 GB default max_wal_size; the remainder of that reserve is unmeasured.
  • CPU tiers, 4 GiB per vCPU, at most 6.5 GiB per vCPU, 96 vCPU and 65,536 GiB disk follow Cloud SQL Enterprise custom machine limits (provider-documented, same page); 624 GiB is 96 × 6.5. Targets billed per node, unit or throughput unit are sized by their backend instead.
  • No public evidence: peak/mean work (2) and the RAM working-set fraction (0.1). Proposed measurements: the p99 one-minute rate over the monthly mean from customer CloudWatch metrics; the buffer hit ratio while stepping RAM under a fixed YCSB-B load.
  • Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
  • The operations/vCPU coefficient supplies the compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
  • Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Compute Engine general-purpose machine pricing: https://cloud.google.com/products/compute/pricing/general-purpose
  • Disk and image pricing: https://cloud.google.com/compute/disks-image-pricing
  • Network pricing: https://cloud.google.com/vpc/network-pricing
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-271febef7b5ad970d96d5373c36c91bf2d6b17bb / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-2. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Compute Engine general-purpose machine pricing, Disk and image pricing, Network pricing.

DynamoDB · Stored data

Estimated monthly service charges by Stored data. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: us-central1; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. Lines connect evaluated samples; intermediate capacity and prices are not inferred. Unpriced means no target quote or cost difference is available within the sizing policy. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. The sizing policy grows compute with translated work and peak headroom, memory with compute and working set, and disk with resident working state and reserve. Monthly usage is distinct from resident data; each workload’s assumptions define the translation. HA changes pricing, not this policy’s throughput estimate. Unpriced workloads exceed the policy’s configuration range; no silent vertical cap or automatic sharding is assumed.
  • Row-store throughput (capacityOpsPerVcpuSecond, default 1500) is measured-by-tensor9 as a lower bound: the DynamoDB adapter on Cloud SQL db-custom-2-7680 (2 vCPU, PostgreSQL 16, us-west1) served 2,974 ops/s of YCSB-A at 16 threads without recorded saturation (src/main/kotlin/t9/prime/equiv/generated/eval/CloudsqlPostgresqlYcsbAT16GoYcsbV1_0_0.kt). Published CPU-bound pgbench reaches 3,101 read-write transactions and 20,289 point reads per vCPU-second (AWS z1d.2xlarge, PostgreSQL 14.5), so actual capacity is likely higher. Reads and writes share one coefficient: at the same adapter version, read-only YCSB-C was not faster than 50%-update YCSB-A.
  • Log-broker throughput (capacityStreamMiBPerVcpuSecond 20 at 0.5 utilization, 4 GiB RAM per vCPU) is provider-documented by Google Managed Service for Apache Kafka sizing (https://docs.cloud.google.com/managed-service-for-apache-kafka/docs/plan-cluster-size): write-equivalent bytes are replicated writes plus a quarter of reads. Producer batches below 10 KB lower per-CPU throughput; that penalty is not modeled.
  • Disk utilization 0.8 is provider-documented headroom below Cloud SQL automatic storage increase, which triggers near 91-95% full (https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/instance-settings). The 20 GiB reserve exceeds PostgreSQL’s 1 GB default max_wal_size; the remainder of that reserve is unmeasured.
  • CPU tiers, 4 GiB per vCPU, at most 6.5 GiB per vCPU, 96 vCPU and 65,536 GiB disk follow Cloud SQL Enterprise custom machine limits (provider-documented, same page); 624 GiB is 96 × 6.5. Targets billed per node, unit or throughput unit are sized by their backend instead.
  • No public evidence: peak/mean work (2) and the RAM working-set fraction (0.1). Proposed measurements: the p99 one-minute rate over the monthly mean from customer CloudWatch metrics; the buffer hit ratio while stepping RAM under a fixed YCSB-B load.
  • Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
  • The operations/vCPU coefficient supplies the compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
  • Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.
Curve assumptions
  • Request meters remain at their independently authored defaults. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → us-central1, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Self-hosted target: PostgreSQL (PostgreSQL License, https://www.postgresql.org/about/licence/). Selected CPU, RAM and physical disk allocation grow with workload; no per-operation price is assumed. No vendor tariff: the target runs on the customer’s Kubernetes nodes, so CPU, RAM and disk bill at the Kubernetes node reference rates, Compute Engine N2 in us-central1 (USD 0.031611/vCPU-hour, 0.004237/GiB-hour) with pd-balanced disk (0.10/GiB-month) and Premium Tier egress. The cost-optimized E2 series lists 0.02181159/vCPU-hour and 0.00292353/GiB-hour; AWS m6i/r6i and Azure D2s v5/E2s v5 both decompose to 0.033/vCPU-hour and 0.00375/GiB-hour. Requested CPU and RAM are billed; node bin-packing waste, system reservations and the cluster control-plane fee are not.
  • Row-store throughput (capacityOpsPerVcpuSecond, default 1500) is measured-by-tensor9 as a lower bound: the DynamoDB adapter on Cloud SQL db-custom-2-7680 (2 vCPU, PostgreSQL 16, us-west1) served 2,974 ops/s of YCSB-A at 16 threads without recorded saturation (src/main/kotlin/t9/prime/equiv/generated/eval/CloudsqlPostgresqlYcsbAT16GoYcsbV1_0_0.kt). Published CPU-bound pgbench reaches 3,101 read-write transactions and 20,289 point reads per vCPU-second (AWS z1d.2xlarge, PostgreSQL 14.5), so actual capacity is likely higher. Reads and writes share one coefficient: at the same adapter version, read-only YCSB-C was not faster than 50%-update YCSB-A.
  • Log-broker throughput (capacityStreamMiBPerVcpuSecond 20 at 0.5 utilization, 4 GiB RAM per vCPU) is provider-documented by Google Managed Service for Apache Kafka sizing (https://docs.cloud.google.com/managed-service-for-apache-kafka/docs/plan-cluster-size): write-equivalent bytes are replicated writes plus a quarter of reads. Producer batches below 10 KB lower per-CPU throughput; that penalty is not modeled.
  • Disk utilization 0.8 is provider-documented headroom below Cloud SQL automatic storage increase, which triggers near 91-95% full (https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/instance-settings). The 20 GiB reserve exceeds PostgreSQL’s 1 GB default max_wal_size; the remainder of that reserve is unmeasured.
  • CPU tiers, 4 GiB per vCPU, at most 6.5 GiB per vCPU, 96 vCPU and 65,536 GiB disk follow Cloud SQL Enterprise custom machine limits (provider-documented, same page); 624 GiB is 96 × 6.5. Targets billed per node, unit or throughput unit are sized by their backend instead.
  • No public evidence: peak/mean work (2) and the RAM working-set fraction (0.1). Proposed measurements: the p99 one-minute rate over the monthly mean from customer CloudWatch metrics; the buffer hit ratio while stepping RAM under a fixed YCSB-B load.
  • Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
  • The operations/vCPU coefficient supplies the compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
  • Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Compute Engine general-purpose machine pricing: https://cloud.google.com/products/compute/pricing/general-purpose
  • Disk and image pricing: https://cloud.google.com/compute/disks-image-pricing
  • Network pricing: https://cloud.google.com/vpc/network-pricing
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-271febef7b5ad970d96d5373c36c91bf2d6b17bb / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-3. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Compute Engine general-purpose machine pricing, Disk and image pricing, Network pricing.

DynamoDB → Scaleway Managed Database for PostgreSQL

Origin API: aws::1.0.0::dynamodb::control. Target backend: scaleway::1.0.0::rdb::postgresql.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: fr-par; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. Lines connect evaluated samples; intermediate capacity and prices are not inferred. Unpriced means no target quote or cost difference is available within the sizing policy. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. The sizing policy grows compute with translated work and peak headroom, memory with compute and working set, and disk with resident working state and reserve. Monthly usage is distinct from resident data; each workload’s assumptions define the translation. HA changes pricing, not this policy’s throughput estimate. Unpriced workloads exceed the policy’s configuration range; no silent vertical cap or automatic sharding is assumed.
  • Row-store throughput (capacityOpsPerVcpuSecond, default 1500) is measured-by-tensor9 as a lower bound: the DynamoDB adapter on Cloud SQL db-custom-2-7680 (2 vCPU, PostgreSQL 16, us-west1) served 2,974 ops/s of YCSB-A at 16 threads without recorded saturation (src/main/kotlin/t9/prime/equiv/generated/eval/CloudsqlPostgresqlYcsbAT16GoYcsbV1_0_0.kt). Published CPU-bound pgbench reaches 3,101 read-write transactions and 20,289 point reads per vCPU-second (AWS z1d.2xlarge, PostgreSQL 14.5), so actual capacity is likely higher. Reads and writes share one coefficient: at the same adapter version, read-only YCSB-C was not faster than 50%-update YCSB-A.
  • Log-broker throughput (capacityStreamMiBPerVcpuSecond 20 at 0.5 utilization, 4 GiB RAM per vCPU) is provider-documented by Google Managed Service for Apache Kafka sizing (https://docs.cloud.google.com/managed-service-for-apache-kafka/docs/plan-cluster-size): write-equivalent bytes are replicated writes plus a quarter of reads. Producer batches below 10 KB lower per-CPU throughput; that penalty is not modeled.
  • Disk utilization 0.8 is provider-documented headroom below Cloud SQL automatic storage increase, which triggers near 91-95% full (https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/instance-settings). The 20 GiB reserve exceeds PostgreSQL’s 1 GB default max_wal_size; the remainder of that reserve is unmeasured.
  • CPU tiers, 4 GiB per vCPU, at most 6.5 GiB per vCPU, 96 vCPU and 65,536 GiB disk follow Cloud SQL Enterprise custom machine limits (provider-documented, same page); 624 GiB is 96 × 6.5. Targets billed per node, unit or throughput unit are sized by their backend instead.
  • No public evidence: peak/mean work (2) and the RAM working-set fraction (0.1). Proposed measurements: the p99 one-minute rate over the monthly mean from customer CloudWatch metrics; the buffer hit ratio while stepping RAM under a fixed YCSB-B load.
  • Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
  • The operations/vCPU coefficient supplies the compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
  • Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.
Curve assumptions
  • Writes and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → fr-par, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Scaleway Managed Database for PostgreSQL at Production Optimized (PRO2) prices in EUR converted at the ECB reference rate. A high-availability or replica node bills Scaleway’s ‘Additional nodes’ price, EUR 0.0583 per hour for PRO2-XXS, 53% of the main node. Scaleway lists no egress charge for Managed Databases, so selected network is not charged. Cost Optimized ranges (DB-DEV-S from EUR 0.0156 per hour), Block Storage 15K and backups (EUR 0.03 per GB-month) are not selected.
  • Row-store throughput (capacityOpsPerVcpuSecond, default 1500) is measured-by-tensor9 as a lower bound: the DynamoDB adapter on Cloud SQL db-custom-2-7680 (2 vCPU, PostgreSQL 16, us-west1) served 2,974 ops/s of YCSB-A at 16 threads without recorded saturation (src/main/kotlin/t9/prime/equiv/generated/eval/CloudsqlPostgresqlYcsbAT16GoYcsbV1_0_0.kt). Published CPU-bound pgbench reaches 3,101 read-write transactions and 20,289 point reads per vCPU-second (AWS z1d.2xlarge, PostgreSQL 14.5), so actual capacity is likely higher. Reads and writes share one coefficient: at the same adapter version, read-only YCSB-C was not faster than 50%-update YCSB-A.
  • Log-broker throughput (capacityStreamMiBPerVcpuSecond 20 at 0.5 utilization, 4 GiB RAM per vCPU) is provider-documented by Google Managed Service for Apache Kafka sizing (https://docs.cloud.google.com/managed-service-for-apache-kafka/docs/plan-cluster-size): write-equivalent bytes are replicated writes plus a quarter of reads. Producer batches below 10 KB lower per-CPU throughput; that penalty is not modeled.
  • Disk utilization 0.8 is provider-documented headroom below Cloud SQL automatic storage increase, which triggers near 91-95% full (https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/instance-settings). The 20 GiB reserve exceeds PostgreSQL’s 1 GB default max_wal_size; the remainder of that reserve is unmeasured.
  • CPU tiers, 4 GiB per vCPU, at most 6.5 GiB per vCPU, 96 vCPU and 65,536 GiB disk follow Cloud SQL Enterprise custom machine limits (provider-documented, same page); 624 GiB is 96 × 6.5. Targets billed per node, unit or throughput unit are sized by their backend instead.
  • No public evidence: peak/mean work (2) and the RAM working-set fraction (0.1). Proposed measurements: the p99 one-minute rate over the monthly mean from customer CloudWatch metrics; the buffer hit ratio while stepping RAM under a fixed YCSB-B load.
  • Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
  • The operations/vCPU coefficient supplies the compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
  • Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Scaleway Managed Databases pricing: https://www.scaleway.com/en/pricing/managed-databases/
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-a8af2fac3e931fad8397d4f3a601989b987a7744 / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-1. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Scaleway Managed Databases pricing.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: fr-par; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. Lines connect evaluated samples; intermediate capacity and prices are not inferred. Unpriced means no target quote or cost difference is available within the sizing policy. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. The sizing policy grows compute with translated work and peak headroom, memory with compute and working set, and disk with resident working state and reserve. Monthly usage is distinct from resident data; each workload’s assumptions define the translation. HA changes pricing, not this policy’s throughput estimate. Unpriced workloads exceed the policy’s configuration range; no silent vertical cap or automatic sharding is assumed.
  • Row-store throughput (capacityOpsPerVcpuSecond, default 1500) is measured-by-tensor9 as a lower bound: the DynamoDB adapter on Cloud SQL db-custom-2-7680 (2 vCPU, PostgreSQL 16, us-west1) served 2,974 ops/s of YCSB-A at 16 threads without recorded saturation (src/main/kotlin/t9/prime/equiv/generated/eval/CloudsqlPostgresqlYcsbAT16GoYcsbV1_0_0.kt). Published CPU-bound pgbench reaches 3,101 read-write transactions and 20,289 point reads per vCPU-second (AWS z1d.2xlarge, PostgreSQL 14.5), so actual capacity is likely higher. Reads and writes share one coefficient: at the same adapter version, read-only YCSB-C was not faster than 50%-update YCSB-A.
  • Log-broker throughput (capacityStreamMiBPerVcpuSecond 20 at 0.5 utilization, 4 GiB RAM per vCPU) is provider-documented by Google Managed Service for Apache Kafka sizing (https://docs.cloud.google.com/managed-service-for-apache-kafka/docs/plan-cluster-size): write-equivalent bytes are replicated writes plus a quarter of reads. Producer batches below 10 KB lower per-CPU throughput; that penalty is not modeled.
  • Disk utilization 0.8 is provider-documented headroom below Cloud SQL automatic storage increase, which triggers near 91-95% full (https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/instance-settings). The 20 GiB reserve exceeds PostgreSQL’s 1 GB default max_wal_size; the remainder of that reserve is unmeasured.
  • CPU tiers, 4 GiB per vCPU, at most 6.5 GiB per vCPU, 96 vCPU and 65,536 GiB disk follow Cloud SQL Enterprise custom machine limits (provider-documented, same page); 624 GiB is 96 × 6.5. Targets billed per node, unit or throughput unit are sized by their backend instead.
  • No public evidence: peak/mean work (2) and the RAM working-set fraction (0.1). Proposed measurements: the p99 one-minute rate over the monthly mean from customer CloudWatch metrics; the buffer hit ratio while stepping RAM under a fixed YCSB-B load.
  • Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
  • The operations/vCPU coefficient supplies the compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
  • Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.
Curve assumptions
  • Reads and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → fr-par, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Scaleway Managed Database for PostgreSQL at Production Optimized (PRO2) prices in EUR converted at the ECB reference rate. A high-availability or replica node bills Scaleway’s ‘Additional nodes’ price, EUR 0.0583 per hour for PRO2-XXS, 53% of the main node. Scaleway lists no egress charge for Managed Databases, so selected network is not charged. Cost Optimized ranges (DB-DEV-S from EUR 0.0156 per hour), Block Storage 15K and backups (EUR 0.03 per GB-month) are not selected.
  • Row-store throughput (capacityOpsPerVcpuSecond, default 1500) is measured-by-tensor9 as a lower bound: the DynamoDB adapter on Cloud SQL db-custom-2-7680 (2 vCPU, PostgreSQL 16, us-west1) served 2,974 ops/s of YCSB-A at 16 threads without recorded saturation (src/main/kotlin/t9/prime/equiv/generated/eval/CloudsqlPostgresqlYcsbAT16GoYcsbV1_0_0.kt). Published CPU-bound pgbench reaches 3,101 read-write transactions and 20,289 point reads per vCPU-second (AWS z1d.2xlarge, PostgreSQL 14.5), so actual capacity is likely higher. Reads and writes share one coefficient: at the same adapter version, read-only YCSB-C was not faster than 50%-update YCSB-A.
  • Log-broker throughput (capacityStreamMiBPerVcpuSecond 20 at 0.5 utilization, 4 GiB RAM per vCPU) is provider-documented by Google Managed Service for Apache Kafka sizing (https://docs.cloud.google.com/managed-service-for-apache-kafka/docs/plan-cluster-size): write-equivalent bytes are replicated writes plus a quarter of reads. Producer batches below 10 KB lower per-CPU throughput; that penalty is not modeled.
  • Disk utilization 0.8 is provider-documented headroom below Cloud SQL automatic storage increase, which triggers near 91-95% full (https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/instance-settings). The 20 GiB reserve exceeds PostgreSQL’s 1 GB default max_wal_size; the remainder of that reserve is unmeasured.
  • CPU tiers, 4 GiB per vCPU, at most 6.5 GiB per vCPU, 96 vCPU and 65,536 GiB disk follow Cloud SQL Enterprise custom machine limits (provider-documented, same page); 624 GiB is 96 × 6.5. Targets billed per node, unit or throughput unit are sized by their backend instead.
  • No public evidence: peak/mean work (2) and the RAM working-set fraction (0.1). Proposed measurements: the p99 one-minute rate over the monthly mean from customer CloudWatch metrics; the buffer hit ratio while stepping RAM under a fixed YCSB-B load.
  • Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
  • The operations/vCPU coefficient supplies the compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
  • Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Scaleway Managed Databases pricing: https://www.scaleway.com/en/pricing/managed-databases/
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-a8af2fac3e931fad8397d4f3a601989b987a7744 / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-2. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Scaleway Managed Databases pricing.

DynamoDB · Stored data

Estimated monthly service charges by Stored data. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: fr-par; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. Lines connect evaluated samples; intermediate capacity and prices are not inferred. Unpriced means no target quote or cost difference is available within the sizing policy. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. The sizing policy grows compute with translated work and peak headroom, memory with compute and working set, and disk with resident working state and reserve. Monthly usage is distinct from resident data; each workload’s assumptions define the translation. HA changes pricing, not this policy’s throughput estimate. Unpriced workloads exceed the policy’s configuration range; no silent vertical cap or automatic sharding is assumed.
  • Row-store throughput (capacityOpsPerVcpuSecond, default 1500) is measured-by-tensor9 as a lower bound: the DynamoDB adapter on Cloud SQL db-custom-2-7680 (2 vCPU, PostgreSQL 16, us-west1) served 2,974 ops/s of YCSB-A at 16 threads without recorded saturation (src/main/kotlin/t9/prime/equiv/generated/eval/CloudsqlPostgresqlYcsbAT16GoYcsbV1_0_0.kt). Published CPU-bound pgbench reaches 3,101 read-write transactions and 20,289 point reads per vCPU-second (AWS z1d.2xlarge, PostgreSQL 14.5), so actual capacity is likely higher. Reads and writes share one coefficient: at the same adapter version, read-only YCSB-C was not faster than 50%-update YCSB-A.
  • Log-broker throughput (capacityStreamMiBPerVcpuSecond 20 at 0.5 utilization, 4 GiB RAM per vCPU) is provider-documented by Google Managed Service for Apache Kafka sizing (https://docs.cloud.google.com/managed-service-for-apache-kafka/docs/plan-cluster-size): write-equivalent bytes are replicated writes plus a quarter of reads. Producer batches below 10 KB lower per-CPU throughput; that penalty is not modeled.
  • Disk utilization 0.8 is provider-documented headroom below Cloud SQL automatic storage increase, which triggers near 91-95% full (https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/instance-settings). The 20 GiB reserve exceeds PostgreSQL’s 1 GB default max_wal_size; the remainder of that reserve is unmeasured.
  • CPU tiers, 4 GiB per vCPU, at most 6.5 GiB per vCPU, 96 vCPU and 65,536 GiB disk follow Cloud SQL Enterprise custom machine limits (provider-documented, same page); 624 GiB is 96 × 6.5. Targets billed per node, unit or throughput unit are sized by their backend instead.
  • No public evidence: peak/mean work (2) and the RAM working-set fraction (0.1). Proposed measurements: the p99 one-minute rate over the monthly mean from customer CloudWatch metrics; the buffer hit ratio while stepping RAM under a fixed YCSB-B load.
  • Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
  • The operations/vCPU coefficient supplies the compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
  • Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.
Curve assumptions
  • Request meters remain at their independently authored defaults. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → fr-par, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Scaleway Managed Database for PostgreSQL at Production Optimized (PRO2) prices in EUR converted at the ECB reference rate. A high-availability or replica node bills Scaleway’s ‘Additional nodes’ price, EUR 0.0583 per hour for PRO2-XXS, 53% of the main node. Scaleway lists no egress charge for Managed Databases, so selected network is not charged. Cost Optimized ranges (DB-DEV-S from EUR 0.0156 per hour), Block Storage 15K and backups (EUR 0.03 per GB-month) are not selected.
  • Row-store throughput (capacityOpsPerVcpuSecond, default 1500) is measured-by-tensor9 as a lower bound: the DynamoDB adapter on Cloud SQL db-custom-2-7680 (2 vCPU, PostgreSQL 16, us-west1) served 2,974 ops/s of YCSB-A at 16 threads without recorded saturation (src/main/kotlin/t9/prime/equiv/generated/eval/CloudsqlPostgresqlYcsbAT16GoYcsbV1_0_0.kt). Published CPU-bound pgbench reaches 3,101 read-write transactions and 20,289 point reads per vCPU-second (AWS z1d.2xlarge, PostgreSQL 14.5), so actual capacity is likely higher. Reads and writes share one coefficient: at the same adapter version, read-only YCSB-C was not faster than 50%-update YCSB-A.
  • Log-broker throughput (capacityStreamMiBPerVcpuSecond 20 at 0.5 utilization, 4 GiB RAM per vCPU) is provider-documented by Google Managed Service for Apache Kafka sizing (https://docs.cloud.google.com/managed-service-for-apache-kafka/docs/plan-cluster-size): write-equivalent bytes are replicated writes plus a quarter of reads. Producer batches below 10 KB lower per-CPU throughput; that penalty is not modeled.
  • Disk utilization 0.8 is provider-documented headroom below Cloud SQL automatic storage increase, which triggers near 91-95% full (https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/instance-settings). The 20 GiB reserve exceeds PostgreSQL’s 1 GB default max_wal_size; the remainder of that reserve is unmeasured.
  • CPU tiers, 4 GiB per vCPU, at most 6.5 GiB per vCPU, 96 vCPU and 65,536 GiB disk follow Cloud SQL Enterprise custom machine limits (provider-documented, same page); 624 GiB is 96 × 6.5. Targets billed per node, unit or throughput unit are sized by their backend instead.
  • No public evidence: peak/mean work (2) and the RAM working-set fraction (0.1). Proposed measurements: the p99 one-minute rate over the monthly mean from customer CloudWatch metrics; the buffer hit ratio while stepping RAM under a fixed YCSB-B load.
  • Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
  • The operations/vCPU coefficient supplies the compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
  • Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Scaleway Managed Databases pricing: https://www.scaleway.com/en/pricing/managed-databases/
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-a8af2fac3e931fad8397d4f3a601989b987a7744 / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-3. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Scaleway Managed Databases pricing.

DynamoDB → Scaleway Managed Database for PostgreSQL

Origin API: aws::1.0.0::dynamodb::table. Target backend: scaleway::1.0.0::rdb::postgresql.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: fr-par; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB read units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB read units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. Lines connect evaluated samples; intermediate capacity and prices are not inferred. Unpriced means no target quote or cost difference is available within the sizing policy. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. The sizing policy grows compute with translated work and peak headroom, memory with compute and working set, and disk with resident working state and reserve. Monthly usage is distinct from resident data; each workload’s assumptions define the translation. HA changes pricing, not this policy’s throughput estimate. Unpriced workloads exceed the policy’s configuration range; no silent vertical cap or automatic sharding is assumed.
  • Row-store throughput (capacityOpsPerVcpuSecond, default 1500) is measured-by-tensor9 as a lower bound: the DynamoDB adapter on Cloud SQL db-custom-2-7680 (2 vCPU, PostgreSQL 16, us-west1) served 2,974 ops/s of YCSB-A at 16 threads without recorded saturation (src/main/kotlin/t9/prime/equiv/generated/eval/CloudsqlPostgresqlYcsbAT16GoYcsbV1_0_0.kt). Published CPU-bound pgbench reaches 3,101 read-write transactions and 20,289 point reads per vCPU-second (AWS z1d.2xlarge, PostgreSQL 14.5), so actual capacity is likely higher. Reads and writes share one coefficient: at the same adapter version, read-only YCSB-C was not faster than 50%-update YCSB-A.
  • Log-broker throughput (capacityStreamMiBPerVcpuSecond 20 at 0.5 utilization, 4 GiB RAM per vCPU) is provider-documented by Google Managed Service for Apache Kafka sizing (https://docs.cloud.google.com/managed-service-for-apache-kafka/docs/plan-cluster-size): write-equivalent bytes are replicated writes plus a quarter of reads. Producer batches below 10 KB lower per-CPU throughput; that penalty is not modeled.
  • Disk utilization 0.8 is provider-documented headroom below Cloud SQL automatic storage increase, which triggers near 91-95% full (https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/instance-settings). The 20 GiB reserve exceeds PostgreSQL’s 1 GB default max_wal_size; the remainder of that reserve is unmeasured.
  • CPU tiers, 4 GiB per vCPU, at most 6.5 GiB per vCPU, 96 vCPU and 65,536 GiB disk follow Cloud SQL Enterprise custom machine limits (provider-documented, same page); 624 GiB is 96 × 6.5. Targets billed per node, unit or throughput unit are sized by their backend instead.
  • No public evidence: peak/mean work (2) and the RAM working-set fraction (0.1). Proposed measurements: the p99 one-minute rate over the monthly mean from customer CloudWatch metrics; the buffer hit ratio while stepping RAM under a fixed YCSB-B load.
  • Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
  • The operations/vCPU coefficient supplies the compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
  • Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.
Curve assumptions
  • Writes and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → fr-par, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Scaleway Managed Database for PostgreSQL at Production Optimized (PRO2) prices in EUR converted at the ECB reference rate. A high-availability or replica node bills Scaleway’s ‘Additional nodes’ price, EUR 0.0583 per hour for PRO2-XXS, 53% of the main node. Scaleway lists no egress charge for Managed Databases, so selected network is not charged. Cost Optimized ranges (DB-DEV-S from EUR 0.0156 per hour), Block Storage 15K and backups (EUR 0.03 per GB-month) are not selected.
  • Row-store throughput (capacityOpsPerVcpuSecond, default 1500) is measured-by-tensor9 as a lower bound: the DynamoDB adapter on Cloud SQL db-custom-2-7680 (2 vCPU, PostgreSQL 16, us-west1) served 2,974 ops/s of YCSB-A at 16 threads without recorded saturation (src/main/kotlin/t9/prime/equiv/generated/eval/CloudsqlPostgresqlYcsbAT16GoYcsbV1_0_0.kt). Published CPU-bound pgbench reaches 3,101 read-write transactions and 20,289 point reads per vCPU-second (AWS z1d.2xlarge, PostgreSQL 14.5), so actual capacity is likely higher. Reads and writes share one coefficient: at the same adapter version, read-only YCSB-C was not faster than 50%-update YCSB-A.
  • Log-broker throughput (capacityStreamMiBPerVcpuSecond 20 at 0.5 utilization, 4 GiB RAM per vCPU) is provider-documented by Google Managed Service for Apache Kafka sizing (https://docs.cloud.google.com/managed-service-for-apache-kafka/docs/plan-cluster-size): write-equivalent bytes are replicated writes plus a quarter of reads. Producer batches below 10 KB lower per-CPU throughput; that penalty is not modeled.
  • Disk utilization 0.8 is provider-documented headroom below Cloud SQL automatic storage increase, which triggers near 91-95% full (https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/instance-settings). The 20 GiB reserve exceeds PostgreSQL’s 1 GB default max_wal_size; the remainder of that reserve is unmeasured.
  • CPU tiers, 4 GiB per vCPU, at most 6.5 GiB per vCPU, 96 vCPU and 65,536 GiB disk follow Cloud SQL Enterprise custom machine limits (provider-documented, same page); 624 GiB is 96 × 6.5. Targets billed per node, unit or throughput unit are sized by their backend instead.
  • No public evidence: peak/mean work (2) and the RAM working-set fraction (0.1). Proposed measurements: the p99 one-minute rate over the monthly mean from customer CloudWatch metrics; the buffer hit ratio while stepping RAM under a fixed YCSB-B load.
  • Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
  • The operations/vCPU coefficient supplies the compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
  • Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Scaleway Managed Databases pricing: https://www.scaleway.com/en/pricing/managed-databases/
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-a5b2d88776c9acb581992c5176447f34ff522ecc / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-1. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Scaleway Managed Databases pricing.

DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units

Estimated monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: fr-par; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · DynamoDB write units: monthly service charges by DynamoDB write units. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. Lines connect evaluated samples; intermediate capacity and prices are not inferred. Unpriced means no target quote or cost difference is available within the sizing policy. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. The sizing policy grows compute with translated work and peak headroom, memory with compute and working set, and disk with resident working state and reserve. Monthly usage is distinct from resident data; each workload’s assumptions define the translation. HA changes pricing, not this policy’s throughput estimate. Unpriced workloads exceed the policy’s configuration range; no silent vertical cap or automatic sharding is assumed.
  • Row-store throughput (capacityOpsPerVcpuSecond, default 1500) is measured-by-tensor9 as a lower bound: the DynamoDB adapter on Cloud SQL db-custom-2-7680 (2 vCPU, PostgreSQL 16, us-west1) served 2,974 ops/s of YCSB-A at 16 threads without recorded saturation (src/main/kotlin/t9/prime/equiv/generated/eval/CloudsqlPostgresqlYcsbAT16GoYcsbV1_0_0.kt). Published CPU-bound pgbench reaches 3,101 read-write transactions and 20,289 point reads per vCPU-second (AWS z1d.2xlarge, PostgreSQL 14.5), so actual capacity is likely higher. Reads and writes share one coefficient: at the same adapter version, read-only YCSB-C was not faster than 50%-update YCSB-A.
  • Log-broker throughput (capacityStreamMiBPerVcpuSecond 20 at 0.5 utilization, 4 GiB RAM per vCPU) is provider-documented by Google Managed Service for Apache Kafka sizing (https://docs.cloud.google.com/managed-service-for-apache-kafka/docs/plan-cluster-size): write-equivalent bytes are replicated writes plus a quarter of reads. Producer batches below 10 KB lower per-CPU throughput; that penalty is not modeled.
  • Disk utilization 0.8 is provider-documented headroom below Cloud SQL automatic storage increase, which triggers near 91-95% full (https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/instance-settings). The 20 GiB reserve exceeds PostgreSQL’s 1 GB default max_wal_size; the remainder of that reserve is unmeasured.
  • CPU tiers, 4 GiB per vCPU, at most 6.5 GiB per vCPU, 96 vCPU and 65,536 GiB disk follow Cloud SQL Enterprise custom machine limits (provider-documented, same page); 624 GiB is 96 × 6.5. Targets billed per node, unit or throughput unit are sized by their backend instead.
  • No public evidence: peak/mean work (2) and the RAM working-set fraction (0.1). Proposed measurements: the p99 one-minute rate over the monthly mean from customer CloudWatch metrics; the buffer hit ratio while stepping RAM under a fixed YCSB-B load.
  • Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
  • The operations/vCPU coefficient supplies the compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
  • Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.
Curve assumptions
  • Reads and storage remain independent. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → fr-par, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Scaleway Managed Database for PostgreSQL at Production Optimized (PRO2) prices in EUR converted at the ECB reference rate. A high-availability or replica node bills Scaleway’s ‘Additional nodes’ price, EUR 0.0583 per hour for PRO2-XXS, 53% of the main node. Scaleway lists no egress charge for Managed Databases, so selected network is not charged. Cost Optimized ranges (DB-DEV-S from EUR 0.0156 per hour), Block Storage 15K and backups (EUR 0.03 per GB-month) are not selected.
  • Row-store throughput (capacityOpsPerVcpuSecond, default 1500) is measured-by-tensor9 as a lower bound: the DynamoDB adapter on Cloud SQL db-custom-2-7680 (2 vCPU, PostgreSQL 16, us-west1) served 2,974 ops/s of YCSB-A at 16 threads without recorded saturation (src/main/kotlin/t9/prime/equiv/generated/eval/CloudsqlPostgresqlYcsbAT16GoYcsbV1_0_0.kt). Published CPU-bound pgbench reaches 3,101 read-write transactions and 20,289 point reads per vCPU-second (AWS z1d.2xlarge, PostgreSQL 14.5), so actual capacity is likely higher. Reads and writes share one coefficient: at the same adapter version, read-only YCSB-C was not faster than 50%-update YCSB-A.
  • Log-broker throughput (capacityStreamMiBPerVcpuSecond 20 at 0.5 utilization, 4 GiB RAM per vCPU) is provider-documented by Google Managed Service for Apache Kafka sizing (https://docs.cloud.google.com/managed-service-for-apache-kafka/docs/plan-cluster-size): write-equivalent bytes are replicated writes plus a quarter of reads. Producer batches below 10 KB lower per-CPU throughput; that penalty is not modeled.
  • Disk utilization 0.8 is provider-documented headroom below Cloud SQL automatic storage increase, which triggers near 91-95% full (https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/instance-settings). The 20 GiB reserve exceeds PostgreSQL’s 1 GB default max_wal_size; the remainder of that reserve is unmeasured.
  • CPU tiers, 4 GiB per vCPU, at most 6.5 GiB per vCPU, 96 vCPU and 65,536 GiB disk follow Cloud SQL Enterprise custom machine limits (provider-documented, same page); 624 GiB is 96 × 6.5. Targets billed per node, unit or throughput unit are sized by their backend instead.
  • No public evidence: peak/mean work (2) and the RAM working-set fraction (0.1). Proposed measurements: the p99 one-minute rate over the monthly mean from customer CloudWatch metrics; the buffer hit ratio while stepping RAM under a fixed YCSB-B load.
  • Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
  • The operations/vCPU coefficient supplies the compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
  • Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Scaleway Managed Databases pricing: https://www.scaleway.com/en/pricing/managed-databases/
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-a5b2d88776c9acb581992c5176447f34ff522ecc / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-2. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Scaleway Managed Databases pricing.

DynamoDB · Stored data

Estimated monthly service charges by Stored data. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: us-east-1; target: fr-par; currency: USD.
DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.DynamoDB · Stored data: monthly service charges by Stored data. Exact values are in the following table.
Comparison pills describe all sampled scale points; card amounts show the named workload. Costs The Same means within 20% at every point. Costs Depend includes mixed results and unpriced samples. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. Lines connect evaluated samples; intermediate capacity and prices are not inferred. Unpriced means no target quote or cost difference is available within the sizing policy. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. The sizing policy grows compute with translated work and peak headroom, memory with compute and working set, and disk with resident working state and reserve. Monthly usage is distinct from resident data; each workload’s assumptions define the translation. HA changes pricing, not this policy’s throughput estimate. Unpriced workloads exceed the policy’s configuration range; no silent vertical cap or automatic sharding is assumed.
  • Row-store throughput (capacityOpsPerVcpuSecond, default 1500) is measured-by-tensor9 as a lower bound: the DynamoDB adapter on Cloud SQL db-custom-2-7680 (2 vCPU, PostgreSQL 16, us-west1) served 2,974 ops/s of YCSB-A at 16 threads without recorded saturation (src/main/kotlin/t9/prime/equiv/generated/eval/CloudsqlPostgresqlYcsbAT16GoYcsbV1_0_0.kt). Published CPU-bound pgbench reaches 3,101 read-write transactions and 20,289 point reads per vCPU-second (AWS z1d.2xlarge, PostgreSQL 14.5), so actual capacity is likely higher. Reads and writes share one coefficient: at the same adapter version, read-only YCSB-C was not faster than 50%-update YCSB-A.
  • Log-broker throughput (capacityStreamMiBPerVcpuSecond 20 at 0.5 utilization, 4 GiB RAM per vCPU) is provider-documented by Google Managed Service for Apache Kafka sizing (https://docs.cloud.google.com/managed-service-for-apache-kafka/docs/plan-cluster-size): write-equivalent bytes are replicated writes plus a quarter of reads. Producer batches below 10 KB lower per-CPU throughput; that penalty is not modeled.
  • Disk utilization 0.8 is provider-documented headroom below Cloud SQL automatic storage increase, which triggers near 91-95% full (https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/instance-settings). The 20 GiB reserve exceeds PostgreSQL’s 1 GB default max_wal_size; the remainder of that reserve is unmeasured.
  • CPU tiers, 4 GiB per vCPU, at most 6.5 GiB per vCPU, 96 vCPU and 65,536 GiB disk follow Cloud SQL Enterprise custom machine limits (provider-documented, same page); 624 GiB is 96 × 6.5. Targets billed per node, unit or throughput unit are sized by their backend instead.
  • No public evidence: peak/mean work (2) and the RAM working-set fraction (0.1). Proposed measurements: the p99 one-minute rate over the monthly mean from customer CloudWatch metrics; the buffer hit ratio while stepping RAM under a fixed YCSB-B load.
  • Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
  • The operations/vCPU coefficient supplies the compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
  • Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.
Curve assumptions
  • Request meters remain at their independently authored defaults. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
  • Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-22; not verified provider prices. us-east-1 → fr-par, USD/month.
  • Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
  • Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
  • Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
  • Rates are cited provider list prices, editable for discounts, commitments or another region. Workload translation and capacity coefficients remain editable planning assumptions, not benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
  • Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
  • Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
  • Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
  • A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
  • This is a declared directed mapping; a planning estimate does not establish deployment or request-serving support.
  • Authored planning assumptions, not measured adapter capacity. Origin rates are cited first-tier list prices, before free allowances and discounts.
  • A cost scenario does not establish backend availability, protocol fidelity or production readiness. Registry serving status remains independent.
  • The control plane and table facet describe the same family workload; allocate shared capacity once, not once per catalog facet.
  • No transactional, global-table, Streams or scan tariff is inferred from ordinary on-demand point units.
  • Scaleway Managed Database for PostgreSQL at Production Optimized (PRO2) prices in EUR converted at the ECB reference rate. A high-availability or replica node bills Scaleway’s ‘Additional nodes’ price, EUR 0.0583 per hour for PRO2-XXS, 53% of the main node. Scaleway lists no egress charge for Managed Databases, so selected network is not charged. Cost Optimized ranges (DB-DEV-S from EUR 0.0156 per hour), Block Storage 15K and backups (EUR 0.03 per GB-month) are not selected.
  • Row-store throughput (capacityOpsPerVcpuSecond, default 1500) is measured-by-tensor9 as a lower bound: the DynamoDB adapter on Cloud SQL db-custom-2-7680 (2 vCPU, PostgreSQL 16, us-west1) served 2,974 ops/s of YCSB-A at 16 threads without recorded saturation (src/main/kotlin/t9/prime/equiv/generated/eval/CloudsqlPostgresqlYcsbAT16GoYcsbV1_0_0.kt). Published CPU-bound pgbench reaches 3,101 read-write transactions and 20,289 point reads per vCPU-second (AWS z1d.2xlarge, PostgreSQL 14.5), so actual capacity is likely higher. Reads and writes share one coefficient: at the same adapter version, read-only YCSB-C was not faster than 50%-update YCSB-A.
  • Log-broker throughput (capacityStreamMiBPerVcpuSecond 20 at 0.5 utilization, 4 GiB RAM per vCPU) is provider-documented by Google Managed Service for Apache Kafka sizing (https://docs.cloud.google.com/managed-service-for-apache-kafka/docs/plan-cluster-size): write-equivalent bytes are replicated writes plus a quarter of reads. Producer batches below 10 KB lower per-CPU throughput; that penalty is not modeled.
  • Disk utilization 0.8 is provider-documented headroom below Cloud SQL automatic storage increase, which triggers near 91-95% full (https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/instance-settings). The 20 GiB reserve exceeds PostgreSQL’s 1 GB default max_wal_size; the remainder of that reserve is unmeasured.
  • CPU tiers, 4 GiB per vCPU, at most 6.5 GiB per vCPU, 96 vCPU and 65,536 GiB disk follow Cloud SQL Enterprise custom machine limits (provider-documented, same page); 624 GiB is 96 × 6.5. Targets billed per node, unit or throughput unit are sized by their backend instead.
  • No public evidence: peak/mean work (2) and the RAM working-set fraction (0.1). Proposed measurements: the p99 one-minute rate over the monthly mean from customer CloudWatch metrics; the buffer hit ratio while stepping RAM under a fixed YCSB-B load.
  • Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
  • The operations/vCPU coefficient supplies the compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
  • Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.
  • AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer: https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonDynamoDB/current/us-east-1/index.json
  • Amazon DynamoDB pricing: https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/pricing/
  • Scaleway Managed Databases pricing: https://www.scaleway.com/en/pricing/managed-databases/
Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:
  • Additional network transfer, backups, KMS, one-time migration and operational labor unless an explicit meter includes them.
  • Destination application execution and separately billed downstream services; supply those allocations separately.
  • Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
  • Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.
List prices read: 2026-10-22. Model: plan-a5b2d88776c9acb581992c5176447f34ff522ecc / 2026-10-22.planning.2. Curve: workload-3. Sources: AWS Price List API, AmazonDynamoDB offer, Amazon DynamoDB pricing, Scaleway Managed Databases pricing. See the service catalog for supported directions, operation coverage and adapter limitations.