Secret Manager costs

Tensor9 Cloud Adapter planning comparisons for google::1.0.0::secret-manager, with backend choices shown together. Read how to think about service-adapter costs for price scope and capacity qualification, or return to additional services.

​

Google Secret Manager → Key Vault

Origin API: google::1.0.0::secret-manager. Target backend: azure::1.0.0::keyvault. Planning estimate with editable assumptions. Unit rates, workload amplification and capacity assumptions are educated guesses awaiting verification. The displayed amounts are planning estimates, not verified provider list-price quotes or benchmark-qualified capacity. Region names identify the authored scenario assumptions. Designed mapping. This cost model describes an intended adapter. Its estimated price does not establish a delivered or selectable backend.

​

Google Secret Manager · Secret-version accesses

Planning estimate with editable assumptions. These authored unit rates and capacity assumptions require provider-price verification and representative benchmarks. They do not constitute verified list-price quotes or evidence that an adapter is available. Estimated monthly service charges from native source usage; no calculator input is required. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: Explicit source planning region; target: Explicit target planning region; currency: USD. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. Only discrete samples are shown. Unpriced means no target quote or cost difference is available within the sizing policy. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. The sizing policy grows compute with translated work and peak headroom, memory with compute and working set, and disk with resident working state and reserve. Monthly usage is distinct from resident data; each workload’s assumptions define the translation. HA changes pricing, not this policy’s throughput estimate. Unpriced workloads exceed the policy’s configuration range; no silent vertical cap or automatic sharding is assumed.

• Authored operation throughput, peak and working-set assumptions are not benchmark-calibrated.
• Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
• The generic operations/vCPU coefficient supplies a provisional compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
• Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.

Curve assumptions

• Monthly operation quantity varies with this steady average rate; stored inventory and other meters retain their defaults. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
• Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-18; not verified provider prices. Explicit source planning region → Explicit target planning region, USD/month.
• Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
• Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
• Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
• Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
• Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
• Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
• Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
• A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
• This exact directed mapping has a design profile. Cost modeling does not establish an implemented or deployable adapter.
• Unit prices, retention, amplification, and capacity coefficients are authored planning guesses; they are editable, not current provider quotes or measured capacity.
• Reverse-cloud Secret Manager adapters are declared designs. This planning scenario assumes a durable record plus reconciled provider copy; it does not certify a delivered implementation or promote availability.
• Application reads use durable adapter records. Managed operations estimate independent backend reconciliation, not a provider secret-access charge on every application read.
• All target rates are editable authored planning guesses, not verified current list prices, customer discounts or benchmark evidence.
• Provider reconciliation operations use the vault-operation tariff; resource inventory is provider-version equivalents with no separate standard secret-storage tariff assumption.
• Authored operation throughput, peak and working-set assumptions are not benchmark-calibrated.
• Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
• The generic operations/vCPU coefficient supplies a provisional compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
• Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.

Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:

• Free allowances, committed discounts, credits, taxes and negotiated rates.
• Commercial Tensor9 fees and operations labor unless entered separately.
• Regional replication, customer-managed KMS, source free allowances and rotation functions.
• Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
• Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.

Planning assumptions authored: 2026-10-18. Model: plan-cd9e6893763424e3abd6c10da1b4b23b43d7de09 / 2026-10-18.planning.1. Curve: workload-1.

​

Google Secret Manager · Active source versions

Planning estimate with editable assumptions. These authored unit rates and capacity assumptions require provider-price verification and representative benchmarks. They do not constitute verified list-price quotes or evidence that an adapter is available. Estimated monthly service charges from native source usage; no calculator input is required. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: Explicit source planning region; target: Explicit target planning region; currency: USD. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. Only discrete samples are shown. Unpriced means no target quote or cost difference is available within the sizing policy. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. The sizing policy grows compute with translated work and peak headroom, memory with compute and working set, and disk with resident working state and reserve. Monthly usage is distinct from resident data; each workload’s assumptions define the translation. HA changes pricing, not this policy’s throughput estimate. Unpriced workloads exceed the policy’s configuration range; no silent vertical cap or automatic sharding is assumed.

• Authored operation throughput, peak and working-set assumptions are not benchmark-calibrated.
• Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
• The generic operations/vCPU coefficient supplies a provisional compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
• Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.

Curve assumptions

• Inventory varies independently of monthly reads and mutations. Retention remains an explicit planning assumption. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
• Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-18; not verified provider prices. Explicit source planning region → Explicit target planning region, USD/month.
• Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
• Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
• Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
• Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
• Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
• Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
• Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
• A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
• This exact directed mapping has a design profile. Cost modeling does not establish an implemented or deployable adapter.
• Unit prices, retention, amplification, and capacity coefficients are authored planning guesses; they are editable, not current provider quotes or measured capacity.
• Reverse-cloud Secret Manager adapters are declared designs. This planning scenario assumes a durable record plus reconciled provider copy; it does not certify a delivered implementation or promote availability.
• Application reads use durable adapter records. Managed operations estimate independent backend reconciliation, not a provider secret-access charge on every application read.
• All target rates are editable authored planning guesses, not verified current list prices, customer discounts or benchmark evidence.
• Provider reconciliation operations use the vault-operation tariff; resource inventory is provider-version equivalents with no separate standard secret-storage tariff assumption.
• Authored operation throughput, peak and working-set assumptions are not benchmark-calibrated.
• Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
• The generic operations/vCPU coefficient supplies a provisional compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
• Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.

Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:

• Free allowances, committed discounts, credits, taxes and negotiated rates.
• Commercial Tensor9 fees and operations labor unless entered separately.
• Regional replication, customer-managed KMS, source free allowances and rotation functions.
• Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
• Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.

Planning assumptions authored: 2026-10-18. Model: plan-cd9e6893763424e3abd6c10da1b4b23b43d7de09 / 2026-10-18.planning.1. Curve: workload-2.

​

Google Secret Manager → Secrets Manager

Origin API: google::1.0.0::secret-manager. Target backend: aws::1.0.0::secretsmanager. Planning estimate with editable assumptions. Unit rates, workload amplification and capacity assumptions are educated guesses awaiting verification. The displayed amounts are planning estimates, not verified provider list-price quotes or benchmark-qualified capacity. Region names identify the authored scenario assumptions. Designed mapping. This cost model describes an intended adapter. Its estimated price does not establish a delivered or selectable backend.

​

Google Secret Manager · Secret-version accesses

Planning estimate with editable assumptions. These authored unit rates and capacity assumptions require provider-price verification and representative benchmarks. They do not constitute verified list-price quotes or evidence that an adapter is available. Estimated monthly service charges from native source usage; no calculator input is required. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: Explicit source planning region; target: Explicit target planning region; currency: USD. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. Only discrete samples are shown. Unpriced means no target quote or cost difference is available within the sizing policy. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. The sizing policy grows compute with translated work and peak headroom, memory with compute and working set, and disk with resident working state and reserve. Monthly usage is distinct from resident data; each workload’s assumptions define the translation. HA changes pricing, not this policy’s throughput estimate. Unpriced workloads exceed the policy’s configuration range; no silent vertical cap or automatic sharding is assumed.

• Authored operation throughput, peak and working-set assumptions are not benchmark-calibrated.
• Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
• The generic operations/vCPU coefficient supplies a provisional compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
• Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.

Curve assumptions

• Monthly operation quantity varies with this steady average rate; stored inventory and other meters retain their defaults. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
• Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-18; not verified provider prices. Explicit source planning region → Explicit target planning region, USD/month.
• Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
• Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
• Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
• Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
• Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
• Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
• Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
• A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
• This exact directed mapping has a design profile. Cost modeling does not establish an implemented or deployable adapter.
• Unit prices, retention, amplification, and capacity coefficients are authored planning guesses; they are editable, not current provider quotes or measured capacity.
• Reverse-cloud Secret Manager adapters are declared designs. This planning scenario assumes a durable record plus reconciled provider copy; it does not certify a delivered implementation or promote availability.
• Application reads use durable adapter records. Managed operations estimate independent backend reconciliation, not a provider secret-access charge on every application read.
• All target rates are editable authored planning guesses, not verified current list prices, customer discounts or benchmark evidence.
• The monthly tariff is per logical secret. Normalize provider-version inventory by the selected providerVersions before applying it; application reads use adapter state.
• Authored operation throughput, peak and working-set assumptions are not benchmark-calibrated.
• Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
• The generic operations/vCPU coefficient supplies a provisional compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
• Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.

Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:

• Free allowances, committed discounts, credits, taxes and negotiated rates.
• Commercial Tensor9 fees and operations labor unless entered separately.
• Regional replication, customer-managed KMS, source free allowances and rotation functions.
• Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
• Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.

Planning assumptions authored: 2026-10-18. Model: plan-96b1d4e954b801d96ec02f26bbb527e1c9945239 / 2026-10-18.planning.1. Curve: workload-1.

​

Google Secret Manager · Active source versions

Planning estimate with editable assumptions. These authored unit rates and capacity assumptions require provider-price verification and representative benchmarks. They do not constitute verified list-price quotes or evidence that an adapter is available. Estimated monthly service charges from native source usage; no calculator input is required. Adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded. Source: Explicit source planning region; target: Explicit target planning region; currency: USD. Exact sampled model outputs in USD/month. Difference means target minus origin; a positive difference means the target costs more. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. Only discrete samples are shown. Unpriced means no target quote or cost difference is available within the sizing policy. Estimated allocation from planning assumptions; not benchmark calibrated. The sizing policy grows compute with translated work and peak headroom, memory with compute and working set, and disk with resident working state and reserve. Monthly usage is distinct from resident data; each workload’s assumptions define the translation. HA changes pricing, not this policy’s throughput estimate. Unpriced workloads exceed the policy’s configuration range; no silent vertical cap or automatic sharding is assumed.

• Authored operation throughput, peak and working-set assumptions are not benchmark-calibrated.
• Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
• The generic operations/vCPU coefficient supplies a provisional compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
• Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.

Curve assumptions

• Inventory varies independently of monthly reads and mutations. Retention remains an explicit planning assumption. Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote. Other native meters retain their explicitly displayed default quantities.
• Planning estimate · editable authored rates and sizing assumptions dated 2026-10-18; not verified provider prices. Explicit source planning region → Explicit target planning region, USD/month.
• Source prices are reference charges, not an invoice. Target lines cover selected service usage/configuration only; adapter hosting and Tensor9 fees are excluded.
• Explicit tariff samples are not performance measurements or capacity qualification. No interpolation or break-even guarantee is implied.
• Variant assumptions show the first axis sample; any axis-dependent configuration is described by this curve’s workload note.
• Editable authored planning guesses, not verified provider tariffs, benchmark measurements or a commercial quote.
• Default-zero rates are explicit assumptions, not evidence that the deployed service or resource is free.
• Provisioned-unit minimums use an editable approximate allocation floor. Modeled target service cost is max(usage/allocation, minimum), with billable network, durable staging and dependent sinks added separately; actual RU/TU sizing, scaling increments and throughput remain unqualified.
• Durable staging is priced once: provisioned targets include adapter state in their selected allocation; native targets add a separate staging allocation when required. Adapter hosting is a separate allocation and must exclude resources already priced as staging, workers or target capacity.
• A declared adapter mapping and cost model do not establish implementation availability or service equivalence.
• This exact directed mapping has a design profile. Cost modeling does not establish an implemented or deployable adapter.
• Unit prices, retention, amplification, and capacity coefficients are authored planning guesses; they are editable, not current provider quotes or measured capacity.
• Reverse-cloud Secret Manager adapters are declared designs. This planning scenario assumes a durable record plus reconciled provider copy; it does not certify a delivered implementation or promote availability.
• Application reads use durable adapter records. Managed operations estimate independent backend reconciliation, not a provider secret-access charge on every application read.
• All target rates are editable authored planning guesses, not verified current list prices, customer discounts or benchmark evidence.
• The monthly tariff is per logical secret. Normalize provider-version inventory by the selected providerVersions before applying it; application reads use adapter state.
• Authored operation throughput, peak and working-set assumptions are not benchmark-calibrated.
• Stored GiB already includes the origin family’s physical footprint assumptions; no second storage amplification is applied.
• The generic operations/vCPU coefficient supplies a provisional compute requirement alongside explicit resource-hour minima.
• Copies and allocation fractions change cost only; they do not increase modeled primary capacity.

Cost scope: Modeled target native service and explicitly modeled state allocation; hosting and Tensor9 fees only when supplied. Excluded costs and workload features:

• Free allowances, committed discounts, credits, taxes and negotiated rates.
• Commercial Tensor9 fees and operations labor unless entered separately.
• Regional replication, customer-managed KMS, source free allowances and rotation functions.
• Taxes, discounts, credits and free-tier allowances unless explicitly reflected in edited rates.
• Unmodeled dependent services, task execution and operations outside the selected workload family.

Planning assumptions authored: 2026-10-18. Model: plan-96b1d4e954b801d96ec02f26bbb527e1c9945239 / 2026-10-18.planning.1. Curve: workload-2. See the service catalog for operation coverage, supported directions and backend limitations.